Page 6 of 8 FirstFirst ... 567 ... LastLast
Results 76 to 90 of 120
  1. #76
    8000+
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Nebraska
    Posts
    8,076

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nunz View Post
    Are you kidding me?
    No.

  2. #77
    7000+ EU1 Player
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    7,133

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jedicake View Post
    No.
    Uhh, suck my dick?

    http://www.cosmosmagazine.com/node/4781/full

    combatarms.nexon.net



    WHOLE FUCKING UNDERSTANDINGS ARE FALLING APART...

    ANd you idiots sit on your thrones of garbage. I hate you.


    also just for lolz

    http://arxiv.org/abs/1109.0941
    Last edited by Nunz; 06-19-2012 at 22:42.

  3. #78
    8000+
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Nebraska
    Posts
    8,076

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nunz View Post
    Where in this article does it say that the big bang is being reconsidered?

  4. #79
    7000+ EU1 Player
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    7,133

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jedicake View Post
    Where in this article does it say that the big bang is being reconsidered?
    "Furthermore the results are consistent with the dark energy model, which has recently been confirm.ed by our team, but are inconsistent with the early seeds of fluctuation of the universe," she commented.



    You're so dumb, jedi.
    Last edited by Nunz; 06-19-2012 at 22:50.

  5. #80
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Outside the box
    Posts
    13,414

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jedicake View Post
    lmfao, no it isn't

    The only reconsideration it's getting is from the fringe groups that think their ideas have more evidence.
    Jedicake. You being the dumbest most useless poster on forumfall should have learned by now that the one who laughs last, laughs best.

    http://www.odec.ca/projects/2004/kha.../problems.html
    http://metaresearch.org/cosmology/BB-top-30.asp
    http://science.howstuffworks.com/dic...-bang-news.htm

    There is, for example, no widely accepted way for physics to explain how such "inflation" could have happened.

    Turok and his associates are simply fed up with these flaws. Renowned theoretical physicist Stephen Hawking and Paul Steinhardt of Princeton University are among Turok's supporters.
    Fringe groups? Fuck lol.

    You know jack shit. And you prove it here on a daily basis.
    Last edited by Bissen; 06-19-2012 at 22:49.

  6. #81
    8000+
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Nebraska
    Posts
    8,076

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nunz View Post
    "Furthermore the results are consistent with the dark energy model, which has recently been confirm.ed by our team, but are inconsistent with the early seeds of fluctuation of the universe," she commented.



    You're so dumb, jedi.
    "Other researchers, such as cosmologist John Webb from the University of New South Wales in Sydney, are working on similar problems. "There are several independent observations which hint at large-scale departures from isotropy. The possibility therefore remains that the cosmological principle is only approximately correct."

    It's too soon to tell if these results are definitive. Other researchers have varied opinions as to what could be the origin of the anisotropy, or the property of being directionally dependent."

    Jumping the gun a little quick there eh?


    Here's an excellent video even a 10 year old brain can understand for you guys http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_mZQ-...=youtu.be&hd=1
    Last edited by Jedicake; 06-19-2012 at 22:53.

  7. #82
    7000+ EU1 Player
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    7,133

    Default

    haha


    You're absolutely right Jedi.




    I was wrong in stating that the big bang is not proven and showing supporting evidence.



    You win.
    Last edited by Nunz; 06-19-2012 at 22:52.

  8. #83

    Default

    A theory can be recognised as a fact. The big bang is on par with evolution.

  9. #84
    7000+ EU1 Player
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    7,133

    Default

    Jedi.


    I only think you're dumb because you are not open to information. You have the ability to learn, if you want to. Just read, dude.

  10. #85
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Outside the box
    Posts
    13,414

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jedicake View Post
    "Other researchers, such as cosmologist John Webb from the University of New South Wales in Sydney, are working on similar problems. "There are several independent observations which hint at large-scale departures from isotropy. The possibility therefore remains that the cosmological principle is only approximately correct."

    It's too soon to tell if these results are definitive. Other researchers have varied opinions as to what could be the origin of the anisotropy, or the property of being directionally dependent."

    Jumping the gun a little quick there eh?
    Lol. Actually FUCK LOL. Too soon to tell ey? You fucking bet ya it is. As is the fucking theory you think fact. You fucking flat earth retard.

  11. #86
    7000+ EU1 Player
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    7,133

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Emolas View Post
    A theory can be recognised as a fact. The big bang is on par with evolution.
    Or, Jedi, you could read things like this and believe it as fact. It's up to you.

  12. #87
    8000+
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Nebraska
    Posts
    8,076

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nunz View Post
    I was wrong in stating that the big bang is not proven and showing supporting evidence.
    The big bang isn't proven, but it does have plenty of evidence.

    You should try reading this website sometime.

    http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/astronomy/bigbang.html

  13. #88
    7000+ EU1 Player
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    7,133

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jedicake View Post
    The big bang isn't proven, but it does have plenty of evidence.

    You should try reading this website sometime.

    http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/astronomy/bigbang.html
    As I posted, this information is archaic and new science is coming out that suggests that whole theories could be inaccurate.

  14. #89
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Outside the box
    Posts
    13,414

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Emolas View Post
    A theory can be recognised as a fact. The big bang is on par with evolution.
    No it most definitely is not. And even evolution has its plot holes.

  15. #90
    8000+
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Nebraska
    Posts
    8,076

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nunz View Post
    As I posted, this information is archaic and new science is coming out that suggests that whole theories could be inaccurate.
    No. It suggests that there are inconsistencies in the model, which I'm happy to agree with.

    Quote Originally Posted by Bissen View Post
    And even evolution has its plot holes.
    Ugh, such a moron.
    Last edited by Jedicake; 06-19-2012 at 23:00.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •