Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Aqucalypse Now

  1. #1
    Normal User EU1 Player
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    798

    Default Aqucalypse Now

    Our oceans have been the victims of a giant Ponzi scheme, waged with Bernie Madoff–like callousness by the world’s fisheries. Beginning in the 1950s, as their operations became increasingly industrialized--with onboard refrigeration, acoustic fish-finders, and, later, GPS--they first depleted stocks of cod, hake, flounder, sole, and halibut in the Northern Hemisphere. As those stocks disappeared, the fleets moved southward, to the coasts of developing nations and, ultimately, all the way to the shores of Antarctica, searching for icefishes and rockcods, and, more recently, for small, shrimplike krill. As the bounty of coastal waters dropped, fisheries moved further offshore, to deeper waters. And, finally, as the larger fish began to disappear, boats began to catch fish that were smaller and uglier--fish never before considered fit for human consumption. Many were renamed so that they could be marketed: The suspicious slimehead became the delicious orange roughy, while the worrisome Patagonian toothfish became the wholesome Chilean seabass. Others, like the homely hoki, were cut up so they could be sold sight-unseen as fish sticks and filets in fast-food restaurants and the frozen-food aisle.

    The scheme was carried out by nothing less than a fishing-industrial complex--an alliance of corporate fishing fleets, lobbyists, parliamentary representatives, and fisheries economists. By hiding behind the romantic image of the small-scale, independent fisherman, they secured political influence and government subsidies far in excess of what would be expected, given their minuscule contribution to the GDP of advanced economies--in the United States, even less than that of the hair salon industry. In Japan, for example, huge, vertically integrated conglomerates, such as Taiyo or the better-known Mitsubishi, lobby their friends in the Japanese Fisheries Agency and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs to help them gain access to the few remaining plentiful stocks of tuna, like those in the waters surrounding South Pacific countries. Beginning in the early 1980s, the United States, which had not traditionally been much of a fishing country, began heavily subsidizing U.S. fleets, producing its own fishing-industrial complex, dominated by large processors and retail chains. Today, governments provide nearly $30 billion in subsidies each year--about one-third of the value of the global catch--that keep fisheries going, even when they have overexploited their resource base. As a result, there are between two and four times as many boats as the annual catch requires, and yet, the funds to “build capacity” keep coming.

    The jig, however, is nearly up. In 1950, the newly constituted Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations estimated that, globally, we were catching about 20 million metric tons of fish (cod, mackerel, tuna, etc.) and invertebrates (lobster, squid, clams, etc.). That catch peaked at 90 million tons per year in the late 1980s, and it has been declining ever since. Much like Madoff’s infamous operation, which required a constant influx of new investments to generate “revenue” for past investors, the global fishing-industrial complex has required a constant influx of new stocks to continue operation. Instead of restricting its catches so that fish can reproduce and maintain their populations, the industry has simply fished until a stock is depleted and then moved on to new or deeper waters, and to smaller and stranger fish. And, just as a Ponzi scheme will collapse once the pool of potential investors has been drained, so too will the fishing industry collapse as the oceans are drained of life.

    http://www.tnr.com/article/environme...quacalypse-now

    To halt this slide toward a marine dystopia, government intervention is required. Regulatory agencies must impose quotas on the amount of fish caught in any given year, and the way they structure such quotas is very important. For example, simply permitting all fisheries to catch a given aggregate number of fish annually results in a wasteful build-up of fleets and vessels as fisheries race to grab as large a share of the quota as possible before their competitors do. Such a system may protect the fish, but it is economically disastrous: The entire annual quota is usually landed in a short period, leading to temporary oversupply, which, in turn, leads to low prices. The alternative is to limit the number of fishermen, with those retaining “access privileges” being able to catch their assigned fraction of the overall quota whenever they want, without competing against other fishermen. Such individual quotas lead to less overall fishing effort and, hence, bigger profit in the fishery.

    ----------------------------------

    Regulation eh? Who on earth needs that shit.....
    Last edited by Khorsy; 04-03-2012 at 01:46.
    "At least I get to fuck."

    Why SSR should stfu about AGW:
    http://forums.darkfallonline.com/sho...=314475&page=7

  2. #2
    Banned Chipatama's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Le Faucigny
    Posts
    2,323

    Default

    tl;dr

  3. #3
    2000+
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    MI
    Posts
    2,006

    Default

    Or, if this is actually something worth giving a shit about (and I, for one, don't) people can actually put their money where their bleeding vagina is and stop patronizing fishing companies deemed to be engaged in unsustainable practices.
    ~Greatness Incarnate~

  4. #4

    Default

    I shall read this while I am not inebriated and reply to you in a gentlemanly fashion.
    Philnaer Grimtrove
    Senior Detective
    Glory Seeker
    Servant of the Great Beard

  5. #5
    Normal User EU1 Player
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    798

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Shaehl View Post
    Or, if this is actually something worth giving a shit about (and I, for one, don't) people can actually put their money where their bleeding vagina is and stop patronizing fishing companies deemed to be engaged in unsustainable practices.
    Well, considering oceans largely depends on fish to remain what it does as the main artery of the world, I'd probably start by giving a shit we might have empty dead waters soon. Not to mention all these trawlers going out of their way to plunder far away from home and deprive locals from feeding themselves. Yay for unregulated exploitation.
    Last edited by Khorsy; 04-03-2012 at 07:26.
    "At least I get to fuck."

    Why SSR should stfu about AGW:
    http://forums.darkfallonline.com/sho...=314475&page=7

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •