A no BS man!
A no BS man!
Call me crazy.... But I feel much safer walking down a street knowing I won't walk past a nutter with a fucking gun.
Ron Paul has no idea what he's talking abut when he's talking about the London riots. What the hell does he think? It wouldn't have happened if we had guns? I've just lost a lot of respect for the man.
London Riots would've been far worse if people had guns.
Ron Paul may be the least corrupted right-winger to run for President, but his platform is still pretty stupid in my opinion.
Last edited by Irenor; 08-22-2011 at 02:57.
"Never argue with an idiot, they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience."Originally Posted by Albert Einstein
The UK riots had one gun shooting, four other deaths.
The LA Riots had 53 deaths despite calling in the national guard.
Jesus.. I would never vote for someone like that.
Last edited by MattMystrieo; 08-22-2011 at 03:01.
Only 3 people were killed. They were ran over. How exactly would "self defence" or a gun have helped them?... He has no idea about the specific incidence, he is just using these deaths as an excuse to help push his agenda of pro-guns. I mean fucking hell, 3 men died. And he didn't even bother to find out how, he just goes straight into using the deaths to push his agenda?... They were killed by a hit and run.. A gun would have been usless. Proof he is just using it to push his agenda, he hasn't even attempted looking into it.innocent bistanders we're killed, in these events a use of self defence would have been justified
Last edited by MattMystrieo; 08-22-2011 at 03:18.
yeah because everyone is going to start shooting at people when they know that the next house or store they break in to, the owner is going to be armed...
you guys are dumb as fucks and have no actual real world experience or theory. You're just spewing out crap that you read off of some other forum about why guns are bad and how everyone is going to be shooting at each other..
I started the Forumfall Hairstyle Meme.
The rioters were in huge groups, if they had guns also do you believe they would have thought "wait.. better not break into that shop, he might be armed!".. About 50+ rioters vs. one man...
No we are not. The fact of the matter is, countries where guns are banned there is MUCH less gun crime. It is safer. There is no argument you are less likley to be shot in a nation with a ban on firearms than one without. Stop being so fucking ignorant and look at the statistics.
You jump to conclusions and don't have a very good grasp of reality if you think a gun would have been 'useless'.
Regardless, the greater point he is making is not that a gun would have saved any specific individual that died. His point is that gov't can not protect you, you must protect yourself and guns are very useful in that regard. And clearly strict gun laws do not protect you since both England and Norway have them.
A few well-placed shotgun blasts from a second floor window would have sent them all scattering, especially if there were others in windows up and down the street.