I never heard of this Scandinavian free market paradise. Your statistics show close wedlock rates as America, however it is noted that social issues from that are much lower due to them being two-parent unmarried homes.
Its not to satisfy everyone, its that those receiving extravagance, like a CEO pocketing tens of millions while his company crashes while workers are left without even compensation, is fair.Communism creates less prosperous society. There can not be equitable distribution in a poor society there is simply not enough resources to satisfy everyone.
Nice, possible useful idiots exist, but that doesn't say anything about communist distinctions. Capitalism has many forms like statist and corporatist, but I don't lump them together.There is a word for people like that. They are useful idiots, they will defend it, rationalize it but in the end they will be thrown to the side by the thugs once the economy fails (it always does).
So your idea is that, I never heard of this and therefore its retarded and already known. No, just go look it up and don't reply to this point.This is the first time I hear of scientific strike breaking. That is what you call it amongst other retarded concepts you use to define things that are already well explained.
By that rights, do you mean better working conditions? Unions were driven on that and higher wages since wages almost always stagnated relative to productivity growth, like it is today.When unions advocate for laws that take away private property rights this is when they are dangerous. Unfortunately vast majority of unions fall into this category.
The biggest companies are state run, the domestic sector is driven off Keynsian policy and the Chinese government has stronger overriding command of companies then the U.S. Liberalization of the economy, yes its probably going to happen, but its essence is still statist for a forseeable future.The Chinese will get all they are asking for as soon as their government stops holding up the west. It is coming, they are practicing aggressive mercantilism. China is massively liberalizing their economy in the process.
Okay I predict tommorow I win a million bucks. Economists have barely predicted economic futures, I doubt you can.Canada, Europe, America and Japan are going to experience a giant economic shock very soon. Society here is still very free and will immediately split on what needs to be done. Socialists can not argue because economics does not agree with their ideas and morally they are also reprehensible. With no free things to promise they will be resoundingly rejected.