Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 18
  1. #1
    12,000+
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    NYC, Beta Tester
    Posts
    12,845

    Default Finance Commete senator won't read the healthcare bill because it is jiberish.

    I want to see partisans on this forum spin this.


    http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/54930

    Finance Committee Democrat Won’t Read Text of Health Bill, Says Anyone Who Claims They’ll Understand It ‘Is Trying to Pull the Wool Over Our Eyes’
    Friday, October 02, 2009
    By Nicholas Ballasy, Video Reporter

    (CNSNews.com) - Sen. Thomas Carper (D.-Del.), a member of the Senate Finance Committee, told CNSNews.com that he does not “expect” to read the actual legislative language of the committee’s health care bill because it is “confusing” and that anyone who claims they are going to read it and understand it is fooling people.

    “I don’t expect to actually read the legislative language because reading the legislative language is among the more confusing things I’ve ever read in my life,” Carper told CNSNews.com.



    Carper described the type of language the actual text of the bill would finally be drafted in as "arcane," "confusing," "hard stuff to understand," and "incomprehensible." He likened it to the "gibberish" used in credit card disclosure forms.

    Last week, the Finance Committee considered an amendment offered by Sen. Jim Bunning (R-Ky.) that would have required the committee to post the full actual language of the proposed legislation online for at least 72 hours before holding a final committee vote on it. The committee defeated the amendment 13-10.

    Sometime in the wee hours of this morning, according to the Associated Press, the Finance Committee finished work on its health-care bill. "It was past 2 a.m. in the East--and Obama's top health care adviser, Nancy-Ann DeParle in attendance--when Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont., the committee chairman, announced that work had been completed on all sections of the legislation," said the AP.

    Thus far, however, the committee has not produced the actual legislative text of the bill. Instead the senators have been working with “conceptual language”—or what some committee members call a “plain English” summary or description of the bill.

    Senator Jeff Bingaman (D-N.M.), who sits on the committee, told CNSNews.com on Thursday that the panel was just following its standard practice in working with a “plain language description” of the bill rather than an actual legislative text.

    “It’s not just conceptual, it’s a plain language description of the various provisions of the bill is what the Senate Finance Committee has always done when it passes legislation and that is turned into legislative language which is what is presented to the full Senate for consideration,” said Bingaman.

    But Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas), who also serves on the committee, said the descriptive language the committee is working with is not good enough because things can get slipped into the legislation unseen.

    “The conceptual language is not good enough,” said Cornyn. “We’ve seen that there are side deals that have been cut, for example, with some special interest groups like the hospital association to hold them harmless from certain cuts that would impact how the CBO scores the bill or determines cost. So we need to know not only the conceptual language, we need to know the detailed legislative language, and we need to know what kind of secret deals have been cut on the side which would have an impact on how much this bill is going to cost and how it will affect health care in America.”

    Carper said he would "probably" read the "plain English version" of the bill as opposed to the actual text.

    In a Thursday afternoon interview outside the hearing room where the Finance Committee was debating the final amendments to the still-unseen bill, Carper explained why he believes it would be useless for both members of the public and members of the Senate to read the bill’s actual text.

    Committee members did not have a “clue,” he said, when one senator recently read them an example of some actual legislative language. When you look at the legislative language, he said, “it really doesn’t make much sense.”

    “When you get into the legislative language, Senator Conrad actually read some of it, several pages of it, the other day and I don’t think anybody had a clue--including people who have served on this committee for decades--what he was talking about,” said Carper. “So, legislative language is so arcane, so confusing, refers to other parts of the code—‘and after the first syllable insert the word X’--and it’s just, it really doesn’t make much sense.”

    Carper questioned whether anybody could read the actual legislative text and credibly claim to understand it.

    If this bill became law, it would mandate dramatic changes in the U.S. health care system.

    “So the idea of reading the plain English version: Yeah, I’ll probably do that,” said Carper. “The idea of reading the legislative language: It’s just anyone who says that they can do that and actually get much out of it is trying to pull the wool over our eyes.”

    Carper compared the full legislative language of the bill to credit card disclosure documents that he described as “gibberish,” meaning that “you can’t read it and really know what it says.”

    When asked if Republican members of the committee should have a chance to read the full text of the bill if they believe they are capable of understanding it, Carper suggested Republicans would only pretend to understand the bill when in fact they would not understand it.

    “They might say that they’re reading it. They might say that they’re understanding it,” said Carper. “But that would probably be the triumph of man’s hope over experience. It’s hard stuff to understand.”

    Carper said if Americans were given the chance to read the actual text of the bill he believes they would decide that it made little sense for either them—or members of Congress—to read such texts because of the difficulty in understanding them.

    “I think if people had the chance to read that they’ll say you know maybe it doesn’t make much sense for either the legislators or me to read that kind of arcane language,” said Carper. “It’s just hard to decipher what it really means.”

    CNSNews.com correspondent Edwin Mora contributed to this report.
    "What, you think just because you need it means you have a right to take mine?"


    Breakdown: Achiever 20.00%, Explorer 26.67%, Killer 93.33%, Socializer 60.00%

    Quote Originally Posted by Methuselah View Post
    I should get ahead of the curve and ban you now then...

  2. #2
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Outside the box
    Posts
    13,414

    Default

    Same problem with the european constitution they never allowed the populations to vote for.

    Can't be read.

    Btw Ireland Voted yes the other day after voting no to it 1 year ago.

    GG democracy!

  3. #3
    12,000+
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    NYC, Beta Tester
    Posts
    12,845

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bissen View Post
    Same problem with the european constitution they never allowed the populations to vote for.

    Can't be read.

    Btw Ireland Voted yes the other day after voting no to it 1 year ago.

    GG democracy!
    They are waging full blown economic warfare against Ireland. I consider them done for.

    However we got some wins with Germans and Japs moving away from Keynesian politics in order to brace them selves for the coming depression.
    "What, you think just because you need it means you have a right to take mine?"


    Breakdown: Achiever 20.00%, Explorer 26.67%, Killer 93.33%, Socializer 60.00%

    Quote Originally Posted by Methuselah View Post
    I should get ahead of the curve and ban you now then...

  4. #4
    Banned Ziegler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    5,595

    Default

    Obviously he's a republican plant.

  5. #5
    6000+
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Canadia
    Posts
    6,857

    Default

    what I got from that, was that your politicians are to stupid to read a normal legal document.


    I am sure it is full of legalese, but you would think a politician would be able to read that kind of thing... maybe its just me.
    Quote Originally Posted by NapalmEnema View Post
    I'll also find out where SSGuy is and blow him. Shaft, balls, swallow the gravy.

  6. #6
    12,000+
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    NYC, Beta Tester
    Posts
    12,845

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jonyak View Post
    what I got from that, was that your politicians are to stupid to read a normal legal document.


    I am sure it is full of legalese, but you would think a politician would be able to read that kind of thing... maybe its just me.
    The bills refer to other bills that refer to other bills. It's hard to even get to the bottom of it. The meaning is lost in between. Most people never bother with such a waste of time. Those that do are ignored.
    "What, you think just because you need it means you have a right to take mine?"


    Breakdown: Achiever 20.00%, Explorer 26.67%, Killer 93.33%, Socializer 60.00%

    Quote Originally Posted by Methuselah View Post
    I should get ahead of the curve and ban you now then...

  7. #7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Silverhandorder View Post
    All bills refer to other bills that refer to other bills. It's hard to even get to the bottom of it. The meaning is lost in between. Most people never bother with such a waste of time. Those that do are ignored.
    Fix'ed that for you.

    When will you Americans start realising that all this democrat vs concervative vs liberal vs left vs right vs libertarian vs fox vs msnbc vs.. is just all the same bullshit given different spins.

    Did anyone of the pro or anti faction ever realise that any system might need some updating, changing or improving. No instead you only bitch against each other because you don't like that a certain group offered the idea and rest blindly support the idea because their group launched it, hence it is infallible.

    Learn to walk in the middle once in a while. You might have more useful discussions and accomplish more useful things.
    Last edited by Sqarak; 10-05-2009 at 14:16.
    Wisdom Of Bots
    1, then tired, do not forget to smile; be anxious, but also pay attention to tone; no matter how tough, do not forget to adhere to; No matter how tired, but also love yourself.
    But we are jet modified and not faint-hearted of difficulties

  8. #8
    4000+ EU1 Player
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    4,328

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Silverhandorder View Post
    They are waging full blown economic warfare against Ireland. I consider them done for.

    However we got some wins with Germans and Japs moving away from Keynesian politics in order to brace them selves for the coming depression.
    As for Germany... no, not really. We do have a more market-friendly government now, but they would still bail out everything "important" if it came down to it again. Free market capitalist is a swearing word around here, all major parties prefer a "social market system" with the government establishing tight business rules - some parties want them to be more tight, some less; there's no real party against this whole system though.

    From what I read about Japan, it seems you are right. Their newly elected party feels that a free market system is favorable and that the government's objective is merely to create a basic rule-set in which a society can develop itself. I liek
    Deflation may be inevitable.
    Money disappears rather quickly once you start burning it for heat.

  9. #9
    12,000+
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    NYC, Beta Tester
    Posts
    12,845

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sqarak View Post
    Learn to walk in the middle once in a while. You might have more useful discussions and accomplish more useful things.
    We walked the middle to the point where the government is socializing industries left and right, propping up monopolies and is waging war against it's own citizens.

    Walking the middle means allowing crooks from both sides to screw you.
    "What, you think just because you need it means you have a right to take mine?"


    Breakdown: Achiever 20.00%, Explorer 26.67%, Killer 93.33%, Socializer 60.00%

    Quote Originally Posted by Methuselah View Post
    I should get ahead of the curve and ban you now then...

  10. #10
    3000+
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Oslo, Norway
    Posts
    3,282

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bissen View Post
    Same problem with the european constitution they never allowed the populations to vote for.

    Can't be read.

    Btw Ireland Voted yes the other day after voting no to it 1 year ago.

    GG democracy!
    Have you read "The Great European Rip-Off" by David Craig and Matthew Elliot?

  11. #11
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Outside the box
    Posts
    13,414

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Silverhandorder View Post
    The bills refer to other bills that refer to other bills. It's hard to even get to the bottom of it. The meaning is lost in between. Most people never bother with such a waste of time. Those that do are ignored.
    Just like the Lisbon treaty lol. The similarities are getting creepy.

    They also said the Lisbon treaty should be a mini treaty. So theymade the distance between the lines shorter.

    It ended up having 8500 more words than the Nice treaty and 67 pages less.

    Don't you just love politics?

  12. #12
    Normal User Long term follower
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Posts
    61

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sqarak View Post
    Did anyone of the pro or anti faction ever realise that any system might need some updating, changing or improving.

    Learn to walk in the middle once in a while. You might have more useful discussions and accomplish more useful things.
    What is the middle ground between good and evil?

    If someone wants to kill you with an axe, are you suggesting a compromise by letting your arms and legs to be chopped off?

  13. #13
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Outside the box
    Posts
    13,414

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by The Cougar View Post
    Have you read "The Great European Rip-Off" by David Craig and Matthew Elliot?
    Nope. Goes off to investigate.

    Edit. Looks interesting. Maybe I'll have a look.
    Last edited by Bissen; 10-05-2009 at 14:36.

  14. #14
    6000+
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Canadia
    Posts
    6,857

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ketu View Post
    What is the middle ground between good and evil?

    If someone wants to kill you with an axe, are you suggesting a compromise by letting your arms and legs to be chopped off?
    thanks for proving his point.
    Quote Originally Posted by NapalmEnema View Post
    I'll also find out where SSGuy is and blow him. Shaft, balls, swallow the gravy.

  15. #15
    11,000+
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    UK, obviously
    Posts
    11,388

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ketu View Post
    What is the middle ground between good and evil?

    If someone wants to kill you with an axe, are you suggesting a compromise by letting your arms and legs to be chopped off?
    If he chops your arms off you could replace them with bear arms!
    Quote Originally Posted by Brannoc View Post
    You are clearly awesome.
    Quote Originally Posted by StainlessSteelRat View Post
    Being socially progressive does not make you 'advanced'.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •