I've never played the first one, and I'd like to know if it's worth getting.
KOTOR 1 is far superior to KOTOR 2. Get it.
I didn't like the first as much.
Oh god... oh god NO!
DON'T MAKE ME CHOOSE!
Loved them both, but I gotta go with KOTOR I
Originally Posted by Charlie Kelly
I think most people are going to choose whatever they played first. I would get it simply because it's a good game, period. The story in both games are well done, and the gameplay is pretty much the same.
can i has kotor 3?
And if you play both it all means more, but out of order, you might find the smaller set of features annoying. But its not as bad as if you played Baldur's gate 2 first, then tried to play 1 without feeling weak and bored. (That was me)
The history and references matter more if you played the first one a few times, and then a few years later played 2. I literally made a squeal of excitement when I saw Carth in the holo recordings on the harbinger.
Atton btw is like Carth 2.0, both whiney bitches but it was still cool to see carth.
They are both worth getting definatly!
But I enjoyed the first a lot more. If you like number 1 thought I would deffinatly get number 2
both are extraordinary games, if you play them backwards it might feel awkward because of the two different developers that got ahold of it but its still a fantastic game and when i replay them i replay both one right after the other, they are just excelent games
kotor 2 has more skills and better enemies, although it sucks for the end boss to be an old fart.
kotor 1 protagonist has more of a history and personality though.
it is worth playing.
If you liked the second one then you will like the first one too.