Go Back   Darkfall Forums > Darkfall Clan Forums > EU1 Clan Discussion

EU1 Clan Discussion This forum section is for discussions revolving around clans. Clans may not be advertised in any capacity here, please use the Clans Recruiting forum for that.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-01-2009, 11:43 AM  
Rak
Normal User
EU1 Player
Long term follower
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Shanghai, China
Default Afghans allying half the server and still losing Calfendar & being sore losers...

So much for all the past claims by Afghans... They were meant to be that elite group crushing the zerg...


Hurt Afghan ego and them being sore losers

All of this started after you got owned in the first Calfendar siege, later on attacked Sweetwater retreating as soon as Osium died and got your Aradoth city seriously destroyed and some video posted about it.

Your ego got so hurt by it that you immediatly ended your wars on the ice island against NWO, started your mass recruitment and alliances to get back at us... even now allying with the people (NWO) you were fighting on ice island (yeah you know those you said you'd crush from that island as you were given a city to do so).

Cairn hurt Afghan's ego to the point that we affected your whole play time, goals and organisation.

Unlike your previous enemies Cairn is not disbanding, nor giving up despite the serious gap in caracter development or the use of battlespikes.

But just because your ego is hurt over a video game, and while the hate is welcomed in game, do you guys really need to make those stupid real life comments about our female players? (apparently threads got moderated and several of you temp suspended).

Hell having Bekka in your team and remembering her virtuous posts over the years I find it funny she posted in one of these threads not even pointing out to one of you guys how immature and sore losers you sounded for posting such comments. You didn't see us post stupid stuff on Bekka, BRN and whatnot... aren't we all in our late 20s/30s by now and above that?

Keep your hate (since you can't seem to just have fun fighting other guilds) for game events or game performance. This kind of real life sexist talk only could make you sound cool if we were all still in our 15s but by now you just sound like immature losers.


Afghans/ex-CotC + BlackWater alliance + Graveyard Alliance + NWO Alliance


To start their war on cairn they first recruited the Ex-CotC (nice anti zerg recruits) whom and other guilds like PVP, etc... in Afghans.

They then teamed with Blackwater alliance/Invictus to siege us, and pushed their alliance further by allying GraveYard in that siege (according to GY members even paying them for help).

And if that wasn't enough... they even allied with NWO in this weekend siege.

So the once so called "anti zerg" "elite" Afghans, recruited CotC (haha) and allied with Blackwater alliance, GraveYard alliance, and NWO alliance.


They tried to justify the latest alliance with NWO by saying there was a 4 alliance siege "on them" but last I check there was a:
  • 2 alliance siege on GY (HK whom GY had sieged earlier and Dune whom said they sieged on their own).
  • 1 alliance siege on the Blackwater alliance by Unknown Alliance in Andruk (and rivers report did mention the Blackwater alliance still exists).
  • 1 alliance siege on the Afghans at Aradoth by Cairn.
No Cairn came to the other sieges, and some of the other sieges people came to Aradoth later on but not that many...

So unless you were indeed a multi alliance zerg to start with, how exactly could you claim one alliance got sieged by 4 alliances? your own logic fails you there...


The result ?

No Cairn town could be kept by Afghans despite their constantly growing allied. PvP and PvB did happen.

Cairn is nowhere near to disband.


That being said, the only cities you were able to take from Cairn were euro player cities you sieged at 3 to 6 AM their time... and only to loose the said cities after the invulnerability timer was off.

I guess the patch should have interesting effects on character development and will further even the playfield.

It will be interesting to see how many more alliance Afghans need to pass to keep their city safe.
__________________
Oct the 24th : Cairn declared winners of DF EU1
4 vs 0 in a 70ish Cairns vs a 300+ Server Zerg composed of remains from Hyperion, CotC, SBA/Yssam, Stasis and Afghans.

Websites:
Keepers of Chaos - Blood AC Darktide - PvP Blog


Rak is offline  
Old 09-01-2009, 11:45 AM  
Vyore
Normal User
US1 Player
EU1 Player
 
Vyore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Default

im sure cairn never exploited the mobs on their island
__________________
Vyore is offline  
Old 09-01-2009, 11:47 AM  
DarKFoRcE31415
Normal User
EU1 Player
 
DarKFoRcE31415's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Default

Out of curiosity i clicked on your "pvp blog" link in your signature, and the first thing i saw was some world of warcraft crap...
__________________
Veni Spellweaver
Visit my Vendor in Ozenhal!
DarKFoRcE31415 is offline  
Old 09-01-2009, 11:48 AM  
ninogan
4000+
EU1 Player
 
ninogan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Sweden
Default

He has stormwind as the logo <3 *bookmarks*
__________________
ninogan is offline  
Old 09-01-2009, 11:48 AM  
kallemander
Duchy of Wessex Clan Member
EU1 Player
 
kallemander's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Pakistan
Default

Seriously, isn't this like the 5th time this happens in Darkfall, why do people still care so much?
__________________


Quote:
Originally Posted by Squatch View Post
Your drawing is so poor I don't believe it violates any of the TOS.
kallemander is offline  
Old 09-01-2009, 11:52 AM  
rschanke
Normal User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Default

Damn, that's some nice propaganda. How could anyone ever take that pile of shit seriously?
__________________
Kastore XII
rschanke is offline  
Old 09-01-2009, 11:55 AM  
Larocco
1000+
EU1 Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: germany
Default

nice recruitment post

Blood is the most successful guild in Darkfall. We are the biggest guild of the server, we own the most holdings and captured the most villages. Our history in other MMORPGs is second to none.
Larocco is offline  
Old 09-01-2009, 11:59 AM  
Rak
Normal User
EU1 Player
Long term follower
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Shanghai, China
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DarKFoRcE31415 View Post
Out of curiosity i clicked on your "pvp blog" link in your signature, and the first thing i saw was some world of warcraft crap...
I didn't update the site since then and if you are unfamiliar with blogs they list the latest content at top.

I played UO from 1997 to 2000. AC from 2000 to 2002.

Then various other games but less seriously as I got pretty busy with work.

World of warcraft was one of them. I think I played from the launch in end 2004 to begining 2005. Too much of a PvE grind for me. No loot in PvP made it tasteless.

Anyway, not sure how its related to the topic of the thread.
__________________
Oct the 24th : Cairn declared winners of DF EU1
4 vs 0 in a 70ish Cairns vs a 300+ Server Zerg composed of remains from Hyperion, CotC, SBA/Yssam, Stasis and Afghans.

Websites:
Keepers of Chaos - Blood AC Darktide - PvP Blog


Rak is offline  
Old 09-01-2009, 12:01 PM  
Bekka
1000+
US1 Player
Long term follower
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Default

I'll just answer to the bit where you call me out for not speaking up about my clanmates being dicks to Lauae. Some other guy called me out about the same thing and I answered in one of the dozen threads about afghan v cairn.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bekka View Post
iQuitHarm, my way to deal with sexism in online games is to still play what I want to play regardless, and say what I want to say regardless. I am sorry that Little Drone got targeted, but I'm sure that if she's been playing for 10 years she can shrug off this stuff and ignore it just like I do with people posting that I blow AV staff so that TheMercs won't get banned and so on and so forth. But yeah, it's no wonder that there are so few women playing online games, it definitely feels like being black in the south in the 50s.
__________________

Larger version
Bekka is offline  
Old 09-01-2009, 12:01 PM  
Dread_Og
Normal User
US1 Player
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Default

Blood is allied with SUN, which is 1 alliance. Blood is allied with SS, which is another alliance. Blood is allied with ALDN, which is 3 alliances. Blood is allied with Dreadlords, which is 4 alliances. According to my calculations Cairn is really a 4 alliance multi-alliance.

edit: Wait, SUN is allied with Blood, which is 5 alliances. SUN is allied with SS, which is 6 alliances. SUN is allied with ALDN, which is 7 alliances. SUN is allied with Dreadlords, which is 8 alliances. SS is allied with SUN, which is 9 alliances. SS is allied with Blood, which is 10 alliances. SS is allied with ALDN, which is 10 alliances. SS is allied with Dreadlords, which is 11 alliances. ALDN is allied with SUN, which is 12 alliances. ALDN is allied with Blood, which is 13 alliances. ALDN is allied with SS, which is 14 alliances. ALDN is allied with Dreadlords, which is 15 alliances. Dreadlords is allied with SUN, which is 16 alliances. Dreadlords is allied with Blood, which is 17 alliances. Dreadlords is allied SS, which is 18 alliances. Dreadlords is allied with ALDN, which is 19 alliances.

Cairn is really a 19 alliance multi-alliance.

Last edited by Dread_Og; 09-01-2009 at 12:06 PM..
Dread_Og is offline  
Old 09-01-2009, 12:02 PM  
Peacekeeper
2000+
US1 Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Canada
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rak View Post
They then teamed with Blackwater alliance/Invictus to siege us, and pushed their alliance further by allying GraveYard in that siege (according to GY members even paying them for help).
paying for help when you beg death for help after outnumbering us already, you kind of left that part out.

Quote:
They tried to justify the latest alliance with NWO by saying there was a 4 alliance siege "on them" but last I check there was a:
  • 2 alliance siege on GY (HK whom GY had sieged earlier and Dune whom said they sieged on their own).
  • 1 alliance siege on the Blackwater alliance by Unknown Alliance in Andruk (and rivers report did mention the Blackwater alliance still exists).
  • 1 alliance siege on the Afghans at Aradoth by Cairn.
No Cairn came to the other sieges, and some of the other sieges people came to Aradoth later on but not that many...
stop crying, you organized for a month to drop sieges like this and then failed epicly. You even admit they came to help you at aradoth. Cairn are the kings of nutcupping on the server, never having done anything without help. Cotc against hyperion, Afghan and SB against cotc, Death against ... well everyone else. You guys keep asking for a 1v1 siege forgetting that when we gave you one the first thing you did was ask someone outside for help even though you already outnumbered us. Any credibility you guys had went out with this.

Quote:
The result ?

No Cairn town could be kept by Afghans despite their constantly growing allied. PvP and PvB did happen.
bragging about sieging a NA alliance in EU times ... good job.

Quote:
Cairn is nowhere near to disband.
That being said, the only cities you were able to take from Cairn were euro player cities you sieged at 3 to 6 AM their time... and only to loose the said cities after the invulnerability timer was off.
you manage to cry about siege times and then leave out that you siege in our offtime all in 1 sentence.
__________________
Byr HAIL

Last edited by Peacekeeper; 09-01-2009 at 12:04 PM..
Peacekeeper is online now  
Old 09-01-2009, 12:03 PM  
Kresthelie
Normal User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Default

Looks more like your trying to prove yourself in the game of Darkfall then Afghans QQ'ing
Kresthelie is offline  
Old 09-01-2009, 12:04 PM  
drinkingjam
2000+
US1 Player
 
drinkingjam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Bangor, Wales.
Default

Rak, I see ZtyX gave you some lessons in how to post, but I'll correct you on some things.

Graveyard / SBA have had a strong history of working together in the past, but only when their help is needed vs a numerically much stronger force. For example, Afghans did not call in the help of Graveyard, infact it was rejected, during the Serruk siege untill Cairn called in the assistance of Death Alliance to further increase the difference in force size. Graveyard worked together with Afghanistan and Blackwater during the quadrasiege because they were the underdogs. There's nothing bad about a 149 bind alliance (Yes, it's the truth, not the crap people have been spreading on DF.urme) gets sieged by a 700 bind alliance (Yeah you're less active, but not the degree where Afghans are more active than you).

Would you have been happier if the Afghans and Graveyard just took rolled over and surrendered to the 2500 bind alliance working to take them down? You sieged at a bad time on the weekend, but you got a fight.

As Graveyard were busy with their own sieges, not one, but two, organised by Cairn no doubt, they were unable to spare many people to assist Aradoth, so The BlackHand (Not any other nWo clans) helped for a short amount of time. Once Graveyard were able to spare more people, nWo were free to kill everyone in the siege. They hung around for a while attacking both parties, but as the defending force was hauled up in the tunnels, they did more damage to the attacking force of Hello Kitty, Unknown Alliance and Cairn.

As any Afghan will tell you, even if you choose not to believe it, they do not want or need any more holdings for their alliance. Why would they? Do they NEED somewhere on Cairn to bind? No. Do they need more resource nodes? No, why would they? Just raid alliances who are overstretched on their defences for their number of holdings. *cough*.

The defenders during the weekend siege (Graveyard, Afghan and Blackwater) fought back, and pissed you off pretty bad (according to the people I've spoken to, and the official forums). It had the desired effect, and they knew you'd siege it back when the majority of their population was offline. Which you did. However, further on their mission to piss you off, they took down an extra guardtower, and it worked.

I can't speak about the 'insult threads' as I didn't see them, and I don't fully understand what happened.

P.S For the record, you can't claim that Afghans have 'too advanced characters' aswell as call them a zerg. It just doesn't work that way I'm afraid.
__________________


EU1 - Rex Woozley
drinkingjam is offline  
Old 09-01-2009, 12:07 PM  
Solvito
1000+
 
Solvito's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Madrid, Spain
Default

these is true...

afghans nutcuppers xDDD, u started ur alliance calling urselves "anti-zerg" and ended up being the server zerg...
when ppl caught up with their skill level, they said they won the game and started quiting..

hahah, im not a cairn member but all i can say is go cairn go...
__________________
i Auto quote myself coz im awesome.
Quote:
AV developers have a partial time job at wallmart...this aint their full time job FFS! take it easy on them!
Solvito is offline  
Old 09-01-2009, 12:14 PM  
dronegan
Normal User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Stockholm
Default

This is sad. You can really see that Afghans are butthurt. They have made like 20+ posts about the city they didint want anyway.

Sorry Afghans but you are loosing it. Goodluck on NA-1, If you are lucky people will still have low magic when you transfer there so you can have your 1 month for glory then claiming you won the server when you start getting owned like here
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nightcrawler View Post
Merc math = divide their numbers by 2 and everyone else's x 2.
dronegan is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2009, Aventurine SA