Serruk back at Cairn

Zalasahr · 08-18-2009, 07:44 PM

Nobody of Afghan was there...Serruk back at Home.

i think they fight only if they know that the chance to win is 100%

Bekka · 08-18-2009, 07:45 PM

Gratz!

LordSpork · 08-18-2009, 07:45 PM

Afghan were busy fighting someone of worth.

Rivers27 · 08-18-2009, 07:45 PM

Oh how lovely

MarkStreit · 08-18-2009, 07:46 PM

Congradulation!

Dalusia · 08-18-2009, 07:56 PM

Afghan was there, with a smaller force this time, 95 afghans vs 40ish cairn.

These numbers were, as always, confirmed by multiple sources.

stylezfosho · 08-18-2009, 08:02 PM

well recall back in and take it again

Dalusia · 08-18-2009, 08:08 PM

going to be a back and forth then huh

Decay[SUN] · 08-18-2009, 08:15 PM

Yeah we took 0 losses.

Afghans were hurt this day.

zenm · 08-18-2009, 08:16 PM

I said from the beginning we would not defend it. The point of taking it was to show your weakness and also your lame tactics with the invuln shields.

The fact that you retook it shows how zergy and lame the alliance is. You have far more holdings than you can use already.

I'll siege and take a different city every week. Its a good way to get us loot. You know like in wow you have Molten core on farm status? We siege a cairn city and farm their players for loot. Easier than pve.

Zalasahr · 08-18-2009, 08:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by zenm

I said from the beginning we would not defend it. The point of taking it was to show your weakness and also your lame tactics with the invuln shields.

The fact that you retook it shows how zergy and lame the alliance is. You have far more holdings than you can use already.

I'll siege and take a different city every week. Its a good way to get us loot. You know like in wow you have Molten core on farm status? We siege a cairn city and farm their players for loot. Easier than pve.

Do u realy believe what u are typing here?