View Full Version : I'm in the elite league
The Dragonbane
12-09-2010, 06:25 AM
Dun dun dun!
1000+, I'm back on track for King!
NewRage
12-09-2010, 06:53 AM
Sorry you aren't in any kind of league unless you have the long term follower tag... you=fail
The Dragonbane
12-09-2010, 06:55 AM
Sorry you aren't in any kind of league unless you have the long term follower tag... you=fail
You is too.
1k? You are smalltime.
Please don't embarass yourself.
UltimateApeBoy
12-09-2010, 07:36 AM
Dun dun dun!
1000+, I'm back on track for King!
Jan 2010 to Dec 2010 thats like 3 posts a day, you need to find something better to do. I find like one thread every 2-3 months that is worthy of a reply.
Please don't embarass yourself.
Yes, I suppose it is denigrating to my dignity to pay attention to the antics of the hoi polloi, isn't it?
The Dragonbane
12-09-2010, 08:09 AM
Yes, I suppose it is denigrating to my dignity to pay attention to the antics of the hoi polloi, isn't it?
To assume I am merely one of the "hoi polloi", as you refer to it, is to look past the facts and lower a veil of ignorance over your mind. However, for someone as casual as yourself, I would not consider it faulty to dismiss your equals, and in this case, superiors.
88Chaz88
12-09-2010, 10:02 AM
I thought everyone knew who you were by now.
Sqarak
12-09-2010, 10:05 AM
I thought everyone knew who you were by now.
WAS.
If you return in any form but the original, you are just a scrub like every other '10-er. BTW, I don't expect many '11-ers to show up next year.
Makestro
12-09-2010, 10:09 AM
WAS.
If you return in any form but the original, you are just a scrub like every other '10-er. BTW, I don't expect many '11-ers to show up next year.
oh my god... 11ers are going to be the worst yet...
88Chaz88
12-09-2010, 10:10 AM
WAS.
If you return in any form but the original, you are just a scrub like every other '10-er. BTW, I don't expect many '11-ers to show up next year.
WERE.
"Who you was" is terrible grammar.
Sqarak
12-09-2010, 10:20 AM
WERE.
"Who you was" is terrible grammar.
I was thinking of "he WAS", but didn't include the "he" to put more emphasis on the WAS. What drove me to do it, I don't know. I just did.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0 Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.