View Full Version : Amatuer Reporter Exposes ACORN
Sharuk
09-11-2009, 06:39 AM
Now for some reason only Fox and a handful of newspapers are covering this
Your Tax Dollars at work!
(Beck, you may not like him but one of the very few that covered it, at least he is entertaining eh?)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bo20Ad8r09s ( not the whole coverage he did, short version really)
(full Show)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jBXIx5qXzSM&feature=channel
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uw8XDRHc6Jc&feature=channel
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YKgZznX5oBQ&feature=channel
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iBpRRTci1d4&feature=channel
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-EP32ITUBKM&feature=channel
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3aU8tpi22Q8&feature=channel
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bfqt2aWHFOY&feature=channel
blindswordsman1
09-11-2009, 06:44 AM
looks like ******* got caught being *******.... nothing to see here folks move along
Villageninja
09-11-2009, 07:04 AM
Would anyone seriously be surprised? Honestly? Come on. This was half a year coming.
Transcripts, pl0x. Watching Fox News broadcasts gives me a resounding headache.
Carnagel
09-11-2009, 09:01 AM
What's the big deal?
The link between prophet Obama and Acorn is fairly tenuous at best - he did a couple of volunteer speeches and represented them once in court. There are no financial ties, and he was never a member of Acorn in any capacity
I'm also a bit surprised that these people can actually show this - isn't there some form of attorney client privilege involved in these kinds of meetings? The people taking the video might actually be in a fair bit of trouble here
Villageninja
09-11-2009, 09:23 AM
What's the big deal?
The link between prophet Obama and Acorn is fairly tenuous at best - he did a couple of volunteer speeches and represented them once in court. There are no financial ties, and he was never a member of Acorn in any capacity
I'm also a bit surprised that these people can actually show this - isn't there some form of attorney client privilege involved in these kinds of meetings? The people taking the video might actually be in a fair bit of trouble here
It's not like Acorn is a corrupt to the bone organization that's going to take part in the 2010 census or anything right?
....right?
Dark Lily
09-11-2009, 09:33 AM
It's not like Acorn is a corrupt to the bone organization that's going to take part in the 2010 census or anything right?
....right?
You think that the government would fiddle the census returns?
[LoD] EE
09-11-2009, 10:13 AM
You think that the government would fiddle the census returns?
Of course they would!
Dark Lily
09-11-2009, 10:29 AM
So what would be the advantage in doing that?
So what would be the advantage in doing that?
They could...tax people who don't exist!
Dark Lily
09-11-2009, 10:38 AM
They could...tax people who don't exist!
Wow that's a stunning idea! I can't imagine why no-one else had come up with that one.
Villageninja
09-11-2009, 11:02 AM
You think that the government would fiddle the census returns?
See... here's the problem. ACORN... is not the government.
Baralis
09-11-2009, 11:33 AM
So what would be the advantage in doing that?
Falsifying numbers in highy pro-democrat regions could grant more government seats to those states.
This is an example on the very extreme side but it will make my point.
Imagin if acorn were allowed to do the census and they wished to put more power into the Democratic party. They could falisify numbers to achive this. Lets say all typically red states they lower the population count by 10% and in blue state they increase population by 30%. It is then possible to swing several more democratic seats into the house and senate.
Dark Lily
09-11-2009, 11:45 AM
Ooooh OK, I can see that would be bad. I was thinking along the lines of voting, but hadn't quite worked out how they'd get more votes from people that didn't exist.
Ziegler
09-11-2009, 03:46 PM
What's the big deal?
The link between prophet Obama and Acorn is fairly tenuous at best - he did a couple of volunteer speeches and represented them once in court. There are no financial ties, and he was never a member of Acorn in any capacity
I'm also a bit surprised that these people can actually show this - isn't there some form of attorney client privilege involved in these kinds of meetings? The people taking the video might actually be in a fair bit of trouble here
http://libertychick.com/be-informed/posts/acorn-money-trail/
And I like how...hey they video taped me breaking the law....arrest them...that's illegal!!!
EDIT: and my wife hides the census form from me..last time I got ahold of it...I took the oppurtunity to put my imagination to work, I always wondered what it would be like to be african american with 12 mexican kids, native american wife making 1 million dollars a year and getting federal assistance...bascially...if I could lie on the form...I did.
Silverhandorder
09-11-2009, 04:41 PM
It makes little sense to me. They organize for democrats and then work to undermine their laws. I understand that one can just chalk these two organizers as immoral bastards that have no ideology. I mean for me it's perfect. I think that prostitution should be legal. Someone getting help in resisting unjust laws is great.
I come to a conclusion that there are two problems that become unavoidable. First is that the organization is compromised. It has been shown many times where they do shit like this on small and big scale. Anyone that keeps doing business with them is willingly supporting those tactics. There are several things they can do to regain confidence of the honest customers. For one they can randomly investigate their organizers. Secondly they should offer a reward to anyone who can expose any of their organizers as a law breaker.
The second problem comes from the fact that recently they have been getting closer and closer to government. What will happen to all those people they help break the law once they become a liability?
jonyak
09-11-2009, 05:09 PM
you're sig is silly.
Silverhandorder
09-11-2009, 05:12 PM
you're sig is silly.
Truth my friend.
Dark Lily
09-11-2009, 05:16 PM
you're sig is silly.
Your spelling is sillier.
jonyak
09-11-2009, 05:20 PM
Your spelling is sillier.
I know knead to spell rite.
jonyak
09-11-2009, 05:22 PM
Truth my friend.
it is. The socialists take the capitalists money, and then the capitalists sell the socialist culture back to the socialists.
StainlessSteelRat
09-11-2009, 06:08 PM
What's the big deal?
The link between prophet Obama and Acorn is fairly tenuous at best - he did a couple of volunteer speeches and represented them once in court. There are no financial ties, and he was never a member of Acorn in any capacity
I'm also a bit surprised that these people can actually show this - isn't there some form of attorney client privilege involved in these kinds of meetings? The people taking the video might actually be in a fair bit of trouble here
Acorn's relationship to the Obama campaign is a matter of public record. Last year, Citizens Consulting Inc., the umbrella group controlling Acorn, was paid $832,000 by the Obama campaign for get-out-the-vote efforts in key primary states. In filings with the Federal Election Commission, the campaign listed the payments as "staging, sound, lighting," only correcting them after reporters from the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review revealed their true nature.
It is particularly important to expose ACORN's political activities because of its new relationship with the Census Bureau, the agency tasked with compiling the 2010 census. The count of the U.S. population will determine which states gain or lose votes in both the U.S. House and the Electoral College, and which districts get more federal handouts.
Rachsucht
09-11-2009, 06:10 PM
Ooooh OK, I can see that would be bad. I was thinking along the lines of voting, but hadn't quite worked out how they'd get more votes from people that didn't exist.
Well, ACORN has found out how to get more votes from people that don't exist:
http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/10/09/acorn.fraud.claims/index.html
Story Highlights
Liberal activist group filed 2,000 fraudulent voter forms, Indiana officials say
They included names of the dead and Jimmy Johns, a restaurant
Elections Board in northern Indiana has stopped processing 5,000 forms
Carnagel
09-11-2009, 06:31 PM
Acorn's relationship to the Obama campaign is a matter of public record. Last year, Citizens Consulting Inc., the umbrella group controlling Acorn, was paid $832,000 by the Obama campaign for get-out-the-vote efforts in key primary states. In filings with the Federal Election Commission, the campaign listed the payments as "staging, sound, lighting," only correcting them after reporters from the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review revealed their true nature.
It is particularly important to expose ACORN's political activities because of its new relationship with the Census Bureau, the agency tasked with compiling the 2010 census. The count of the U.S. population will determine which states gain or lose votes in both the U.S. House and the Electoral College, and which districts get more federal handouts.
Acorn / CCI / Rathke are obviously in need of a senatorial investigation for a number of issues
But there is no direct link between any of these issues and Obama himself. Trying to link them using the above reference is like saying the entire US Government is guilty because an organization they contracted to committed a crime unrelated to their contractual agreement - it's ludicrous, and has no legal standing whatsoever
It's all media spin doctoring innuendo and muck raking at it's highest pitch to try and rouse the sheeple into a seething frenzy of self righteous anger
StainlessSteelRat
09-11-2009, 06:48 PM
Acorn / CCI / Rathke are obviously in need of a senatorial investigation for a number of issues
But there is no direct link between any of these issues and Obama himself. Trying to link them using the above reference is like saying the entire US Government is guilty because an organization they contracted to committed a crime unrelated to their contractual agreement - it's ludicrous, and has no legal standing whatsoever
It's all media spin doctoring innuendo and muck raking at it's highest pitch to try and rouse the sheeple into a seething frenzy of self righteous anger
the umbrella group controlling Acorn, was paid $832,000 by the Obama campaign
doomahx
09-11-2009, 07:07 PM
holy fucking shit! corruption?!?! IN POLITICS?!?!?!?!
Well I never!
StainlessSteelRat
09-11-2009, 07:21 PM
holy fucking shit! corruption?!?! IN POLITICS?!?!?!?!
Well I never!
Ineffective use of sarcastic shock since no one is shocked.
I am merely trying to enlighten the ostrich.
Attau
09-11-2009, 08:00 PM
...then the capitalists sell the socialist culture back to the socialists.
You are so close to an "ah ha!" moment right there.
Ziegler
09-11-2009, 08:21 PM
the umbrella group controlling Acorn, was paid $832,000 by the Obama campaign
aahhh...I see you are confused SSRat....see...that is the obama CAMPAIGN...it is in no way actually associated with Obama himself, or...Obama wasnt aware of this...just like he wasnt aware of Rev Wright, Bill ayers, Mrs Dorn, Van Jones...et al.
I hope I helped clear up the confusion for you.
StainlessSteelRat
09-11-2009, 09:01 PM
aahhh...I see you are confused SSRat....see...that is the obama CAMPAIGN...it is in no way actually associated with Obama himself, or...Obama wasnt aware of this...just like he wasnt aware of Rev Wright, Bill ayers, Mrs Dorn, Van Jones...et al.
I hope I helped clear up the confusion for you.
Oh yes, thank you so much. I might have said something stupid were it not for your keen observation skills.
Carry on, Carnagel. I stand corrected.
Carnagel
09-11-2009, 09:29 PM
Oh yes, thank you so much. I might have said something stupid were it not for your keen observation skills.
Carry on, Carnagel. I stand corrected.
You can't hold political parties responsible for the actions of third party organizations after the election campaign is over, or issues occurring completely outside the scope of the campaign itself
You can make a case that any future association with a questionable organization would not be advisable, at least until a thorough investigation is carried out
CCI were paid for services rendered, the same as hundreds of other organizations. At that point in time none of these allegations had surfaced
If guilt-by-past-association was part of the legal system, then there are currently a few thousand high profile people who invested money in the Madoff Ponzi scheme who may need to be brought to justice...
Jangang
09-11-2009, 10:47 PM
So what would be the advantage in doing that?
Manipulating how many seats each state gets in the house maybe? By extension being able to manipulate how many seats each party is likely to get in the house...
Having access to the names of ever man women and child born in the country... Which when you consider they've already been shown to be big on voter fraud is a HUGE problem...
And that is just the very tip of the iceberg, I'm sure someone else can shed more light on the subject and do a better job than I could at it.
The list goes on, and on, and on...
StainlessSteelRat
09-11-2009, 11:57 PM
You can't hold political parties responsible for the actions of third party organizations after the election campaign is over, or issues occurring completely outside the scope of the campaign itself
You can make a case that any future association with a questionable organization would not be advisable, at least until a thorough investigation is carried out
CCI were paid for services rendered, the same as hundreds of other organizations. At that point in time none of these allegations had surfaced
If guilt-by-past-association was part of the legal system, then there are currently a few thousand high profile people who invested money in the Madoff Ponzi scheme who may need to be brought to justice...
Please tell me you are woefully uninformed and not just dumb.
http://www.epionline.org/news_detail.cfm?rid=171
They were already suspected of fraud during the '04 campaign.
The Obama campaign is Obama, not the Dem party. And no one is accusing Obama of voter fraud but he does continue to fund Acorn which was accused and convicted on several occasions.
It's more like PETA hiring Michael Vick to run 'neuter-your-pet' drives and pretending to have 'clean hands' when dogs end up missing.
Sharuk
09-12-2009, 03:31 AM
Acorn / CCI / Rathke are obviously in need of a senatorial investigation for a number of issues
But there is no direct link between any of these issues and Obama himself. Trying to link them using the above reference is like saying the entire US Government is guilty because an organization they contracted to committed a crime unrelated to their contractual agreement - it's ludicrous, and has no legal standing whatsoever
It's all media spin doctoring innuendo and muck raking at it's highest pitch to try and rouse the sheeple into a seething frenzy of self righteous anger
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rmn4ptXu21Y
Lets not forget Obama was a community organizer
Sharuk
09-12-2009, 04:32 AM
And what do you know its not just "rouge Employee's"
(Beck again, i guess this isnt that important to the other networks)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oRTlR6Q0y-4
Sharuk
09-12-2009, 05:41 AM
Update: Census Bureau cuts ties with ACORN
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32806131/ns/politics-more_politics/
I love how MSNBC makes ACORN look not so bad and credits this to Republicans.... has nothing to do with Republicans
Villageninja
09-12-2009, 08:30 AM
Update: Census Bureau cuts ties with ACORN
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32806131/ns/politics-more_politics/
I love how MSNBC makes ACORN look not so bad and credits this to Republicans.... has nothing to do with Republicans
Would have been a fuckin disaster if ACORN had been part of the census
I like all this rage about "Z0mgz other networks not covering :(" but when I checked last night, this story was on the front page of CNN.com.
Sharuk
09-12-2009, 06:44 PM
I like all this rage about "Z0mgz other networks not covering :(" but when I checked last night, this story was on the front page of CNN.com.
CNN has covered it, but only a few times, and even then a day after it broke, most other news networks have covered it either one time or not at all last time i checked
Tenebrion
09-12-2009, 07:13 PM
So, let's see a show of hands here. How many people in this thread disapproved of Adolf Hitler and George W Bush? I don't expect to see too many hands.
Honestly, you party-puppets are pretty pathetic. You all sat happy as clams while the country was driven into the ground over the last eight years, and now that a lefty's in office you're all up in arms over shit that isn't happening now, but that was happening then. Get real.
You want to talk about losing liberties and Big Brother? Let's talk about the Patriot Act, "Protest Zones", Haliburton, and some of the most rampant corruption America has ever seen.
Dip-shits.
Sharuk
09-12-2009, 07:24 PM
So, let's see a show of hands here. How many people in this thread disapproved of Adolf Hitler and George W Bush? I don't expect to see too many hands.
Honestly, you party-puppets are pretty pathetic. You all sat happy as clams while the country was driven into the ground over the last eight years, and now that a lefty's in office you're all up in arms over shit that isn't happening now, but that was happening then. Get real.
You want to talk about losing liberties and Big Brother? Let's talk about the Patriot Act, "Protest Zones", Haliburton, and some of the most rampant corruption America has ever seen.
Dip-shits.
America wasnt awake 8 years ago, now it is
"...they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. That whenever any form of government becomes destructive to these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shown that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security. --Such has been the patient sufferance of these colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former systems of government. "
Its taken the last 8 years, well 100 years really of this crap for people to finally care, and open their eyes. For decades the government has only been right when its your party, now its changing, we can only hope its not too late, because the two party system is already ingrained deep into our heads and there are still people who can not see past it, which is pretty scary, and alot of these people are newsman who control the masses, and if you talk to a kid (High School, Elementry, College whatever) alot of them are full of propaganda, schools dont teach you how to think
The next four years will determine if America stays American
StainlessSteelRat
09-12-2009, 08:49 PM
So, let's see a show of hands here. How many people in this thread disapproved of Adolf Hitler and George W Bush? I don't expect to see too many hands.
Honestly, you party-puppets are pretty pathetic. You all sat happy as clams while the country was driven into the ground over the last eight years, and now that a lefty's in office you're all up in arms over shit that isn't happening now, but that was happening then. Get real.
You want to talk about losing liberties and Big Brother? Let's talk about the Patriot Act, "Protest Zones", Haliburton, and some of the most rampant corruption America has ever seen.
Dip-shits.
Where have you been the last 8 years? OT was full of all that shit.
You call people party puppets but you are the type that only sees fault on one side of the aisle. Most OTers didn't like Bush or his policies. And here's a little news flash for you: Obama hasn't changed any of them.
Rossco
09-12-2009, 09:01 PM
Where have you been the last 8 years? OT was full of all that shit.
You call people party puppets but you are the type that only sees fault on one side of the aisle. Most OTers didn't like Bush or his policies. And here's a little news flash for you: Obama hasn't changed any of them.
Before DF launched, when Forumfall was still alive, the average (excluding idiots) forumfaller was far smarter, if opinionated, then the majority of the blind American masses.
StainlessSteelRat
09-12-2009, 09:17 PM
Before DF launched, when Forumfall was still alive, the average (excluding idiots) forumfaller was far smarter, if opinionated, then the majority of the blind American masses.
Way to make a blanket generalization laced w/ qualifiers and disclaimers, effectively rendering your statement meaningless.
Silverhandorder
09-12-2009, 09:34 PM
So, let's see a show of hands here. How many people in this thread disapproved of Adolf Hitler and George W Bush? I don't expect to see too many hands.
Bs this forum was always anti Bush.
Brannoc
09-13-2009, 04:11 AM
Before DF launched, when Forumfall was still alive, the average (excluding idiots) forumfaller was far smarter, if opinionated, then the majority of the blind American masses.
Wtf forumfall was I reading then?
Systemaddict
09-13-2009, 04:26 AM
I dont dislike Obama.
I just disagree with his policies.
PirateGlen
09-13-2009, 07:00 AM
Yeah... just look at him... managin' the community and shit.
SSguy
09-13-2009, 07:53 AM
Wtf forumfall was I reading then?
General Discussion
General Discussion
No. Just...no.
vBulletin® v3.8.4, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.