View Full Version : Sieges or City Transfers
Damedius
07-29-2009, 10:58 PM
I've seen two challenges dropped today. Anybody know any details?
Grayheart
07-29-2009, 11:13 PM
both x-fers
Lunar-01
07-30-2009, 01:11 AM
You sure about the sacred siege?
Cross02
07-30-2009, 01:13 AM
You sure about the sacred siege?
It's a transfer. I'm sure.
The alliances seem to be content sitting back and not getting themselves involved in any wars yet.
Skullfukt
07-30-2009, 01:43 AM
It's a transfer. I'm sure.
The alliances seem to be content sitting back and not getting themselves involved in any wars yet.
Not a transfer. We aren't going to defend it though.
Santharix
07-30-2009, 09:15 AM
Afaik the khayud siege wasn't a transfer either.
Iteroni
07-30-2009, 09:27 AM
O.K., I am officially confuzzled. Were they sieges or city transfers?
Reigner
07-30-2009, 09:55 AM
O.K., I am officially confuzzled. Were they sieges or city transfers?
Sacred General said it wasnt a transfer, so Im assuming it wasnt. Not sure about the other one...
Mulciber
07-30-2009, 04:07 PM
Most likely guilds realizing that they dont need/want assets and dont care if they get taken.
"we didnt want that city anyway" is actually a valid statement on NA1
Skullfukt
07-30-2009, 06:39 PM
Most likely guilds realizing that they dont need/want assets and dont care if they get taken.
"we didnt want that city anyway" is actually a valid statement on NA1
Unfortunately it is :(
At least for ruby.
Mulciber
07-30-2009, 06:59 PM
Unfortunately it is :(
At least for ruby.
see, i lived on ice on EU1 and i can tell you that NOBODY realllly wants to live on the islands, they just think they do.
exception would be yssam due to the resources. Always will be fights there.
Skullfukt
07-30-2009, 07:00 PM
see, i lived on ice on EU1 and i can tell you that NOBODY realllly wants to live on the islands, they just think they do.
exception would be yssam due to the resources. Always will be fights there.
Yeah I played around a lil on ice island EU as well, its really fun when the island is contested by 2 or 3 alliances though. :D
Chuck Zitto
07-30-2009, 07:40 PM
Been to two sieges so far on na one of them being khayud. No it was not a transfer. Both sieges were bugged and the clanstones were not vulnerable for either the attackers or defenders in both cases. In khayud a gm fixed it so the stone took dmg but gave no system message saying that dmg was done.
vBulletin® v3.8.4, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.