I'm confused about zerging

[Ebs]

When your side is doing it you call it 'organized PvP' or 'That's just how this game is.'

When the enemie does it, you call it 'zerging' and 'carebearing'.

Sounds about right?

[Cailian]

As I said somewhere else just before this post, the zerg-complains are getting annoying. As you say, a guild with over 100 players is instantly a 'zerg', even if they are in fact very organized.
I guess some people are just jealous of the numbers some guilds have. I mean, sure, if you have 20 very leet pvp people, your good. But they can never handle 60 organized not-so-leet pvp people.
The word 'zerg' is overused.

[madgopher]

pretty much , every large battle is a zerg ,unless you have military like training after initial contact it a zerg ,just like real life IN historic combat. The organized armies like Rome or Carthage basically could kick the hell out of barbarian armies. IN THIS GAME AND ANY OTHER NEVER SEEN A BATTLE WHERE EVEN A SHIELD WALL HOLDS ALWAYS CHARGES AND RETREATS.

[Gadzy]

Zerg is a positive word to me. ;)

[Rhasta]

When your side is doing it you call it 'organized PvP' or 'That's just how this game is.'

When the enemie does it, you call it 'zerging' and 'carebearing'.

Sounds about right?


Zergs are only crying non factor 'leet' guilds who will never achieve nothing but random PKing. Numbers are everything if you dont have enough be sure you will loose in 99% of situations. Main difference is how you handle and coordinate those numbers.

[myrath]

When your side is doing it you call it 'organized PvP' or 'That's just how this game is.'

When the enemie does it, you call it 'zerging' and 'carebearing'.

Sounds about right?

A zerg is when you use 150 men to beat 10.

[Echaos]

A zerg is when you use 150 men to beat 10.

This, hah.

[Alfera]

A zerg is when you use 150 men to beat 10.

This one :D