An advanced and well thought out discussion in OT.

[hazy]

What came first the chicken or the hydrogen molecule?

[Speljohan]

What came first the chicken or the hydrogen molecule?

The Pitchfork.

[DeadlyHit]

The Pitchfork.

I think this wins.

[hazy]

Ahh very interesting, but if you factor in that chickens are obviously required for the proper completion of any good pitchfork the idea can be dis-proven.

Now if the hydrogen molecule combined with the carbon dioxide emitted by Jesus' H2, it could then form a weapon of mass destruction the equivalent of say a pitchfork.

So the debate continues with no clear answer in site.

[Someone]

Well if I remeber it correctly you can't have a sun without a hydrogen molecule and without sun there be no chicken. So the obvious answear is a pitchfork.

[Speljohan]

Ahh very interesting, but if you factor in that chickens are obviously required for the proper completion of any good pitchfork the idea can be dis-proven.

Now if the hydrogen molecule combined with the carbon dioxide emitted by Jesus' H2, it could then form a weapon of mass destruction the equivalent of say a pitchfork.

So the debate continues with no clear answer in site.

I like your thinking.

[hazy]

I like your thinking.

Thank you sir I like your sig, Metallica does in fact suck :sly:

[Cribble]

Lol wtf? It's obviously the treeshrew.

[Honest Bill]

It is an interesting question. And also, which came first?

Advanced and well thought out discussions?
or
Long white beards?

[aruzo]

I think the chicken did dude, definatly.

[HauptmannHP]

It is an interesting question. And also, which came first?

Advanced and well thought out discussions?
or
Long white beards?

I would say advanced and well thought out discussions. Because it wasn't until people started having discussions like that they discovered that their arguments had no weight if they didn't have long white beards.

[aruzo]

i would say advanced and well thought out discussions. Because it wasn't until people started having discussions like that they discovered that their arguments had no weight if they didn't have long white beards.
qft!

[Honest Bill]

I would say advanced and well thought out discussions. Because it wasn't until people started having discussions like that they discovered that their arguments had no weight if they didn't have long white beards.

Good point, but wouldn't they have needed the beards to be able to come to such an understanding?

[DeadlyHit]

Ahh very interesting, but if you factor in that chickens are obviously required for the proper completion of any good pitchfork the idea can be dis-proven.

Now if the hydrogen molecule combined with the carbon dioxide emitted by Jesus' H2, it could then form a weapon of mass destruction the equivalent of say a pitchfork.

So the debate continues with no clear answer in site.

:lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao:
:ninja:

[Thinkharder]

What came first the chicken or the hydrogen molecule?

The ban hammer.

[hazy]

The ban hammer.

Please sir this is an advanced discussion about the link between chickens and Jesus. Try to stay on topic.

[aruzo]

Chicken or the egg was always a big mystery!

The Ban Hammer sounds just about right! haha.

[HauptmannHP]

Good point, but wouldn't they have needed the beards to be able to come to such an understanding?

Hmm, maybe.

[Honest Bill]

Hmm,

I take it that's the sound you make as you stroke you beard ponderously

[aruzo]

Good point, but wouldn't they have needed the beards to be able to come to such an understanding?
Well yeah the beard would be age therefore it would take such a age and understanding to understand it. I hope that helped!

[Uncle Mo]

I'm not sure how yet, but I'm almost certain that this discussion would be incomplete without factoring in and accounting for Bewbs.

[hazy]

I'm not sure how yet, but I'm almost certain that this discussion would be incomplete without factoring in and accounting for Bewbs.

Always a logical conclusion, bewbs are a fundamental part of any advanced calculations but first a theorem would have to be devised. I'm thinking:

(bewb)² + √½PI(x * ƒⁿ)^6 / chicken * pitchfork

I might have missed something feel free to add corrections.

[Honest Bill]

Always a logical conclusion, bewbs are a fundamental part of any advanced calculations but first a theorem would have to be devised. I'm thinking:

(bewb)² + √½PI(x * ƒⁿ)^6 / chicken * pitchfork

I might have missed something feel free to add corrections.

I think you should have added Jesus*6

[hazy]

I think you should have added Jesus*6

Of course, how could I forget Jesus:

Chicken Theorem v1.1

(bewb)² + √½PI(x * ƒⁿ)^6 / chicken * pitchfork = ¼(Jesus * 6)


Again, suggestions are welcome.

[Thinkharder]

Of course, how could I forget Jesus:

Chicken Theorem v1.1

(bewb)² + √½PI(x * ƒⁿ)^6 / chicken * pitchfork = ¼(Jesus * 6)


Again, suggestions are welcome.

Boredom should be in there somewhere too I think...

[hazy]

Boredom should be in there somewhere too I think...

Again my intellect fails me. Okay this is the correct and final version of the equation:

boredom = ((bewb)² + √½PI(x * ƒⁿ)^6 / chicken * pitchfork = ¼(Jesus * 6))

Okay, great banter thanks guys but I have to get ready for this Super Bowl party. It's been quite amusing ;)

[Uncle Mo]

Again my intellect fails me. Okay this is the correct and final version of the equation:

boredom = ((bewb)² + √½PI(x * ƒⁿ)^6 / chicken * pitchfork = ¼(Jesus * 6))

Okay, great banter thanks guys but I have to get ready for this Super Bowl party. It's been quite amusing ;)

LoL, that's sig worthy.