PDA

View Full Version : Politics: Lesbian parents raise happy, healthy children



Qikdraw
01-18-2009, 05:45
Lesbian parents raise happy, healthy children according to 22-year study (http://www.pinknews.co.uk/news/articles/2005-10025.html)


Lesbian parents raise happy, healthy children according to 22 year study

The longest-running study into lesbian parents in the United States has found that discrimination and not the sexual orientation of their parents harms children.

Vessol
01-18-2009, 05:47
no shit sherlock

Lamiosa
01-18-2009, 05:49
Means the child is ok of their parents till the kids in school begin to harass the child about it. Kids can be assholes, I saw it enough in Forumfall and WoW, nothing new to me.

Sharuk
01-18-2009, 05:50
And your point is what?

Megumi
01-18-2009, 05:51
Means the child is ok of their parents till the kids in school begin to harass the child about it. Kids can be assholes, I saw it enough in Forumfall and WoW, nothing new to me.

I knew a guy with lesbian parents.

He never got any shit for it. Everyone always wanted to stay over at his house though >.>

Honest Bill
01-18-2009, 05:51
There was never any doubt that lesbians can raise children correctly, except in the minds of the irrational, and religious fundamentalists

Lamiosa
01-18-2009, 05:55
I knew a guy with lesbian parents.

He never got any shit for it. Everyone always wanted to stay over at his house though >.>

Guess lesbians are more accepted by males than gay males are, because many males becomes horny of them. Females (speaking at elast of me) are more ok in general with lesbians and gay anyway, so it is also not that problem.

Honest Bill
01-18-2009, 05:56
Guess lesbians are more accepted by males than gay males are, because many males becomes horny of them. Females (speaking at elast of me) are more ok in general with lesbians and gay anyway, so it is also not that problem.

While that is definitely true. There is still not a reasonable argument as to why gay men can't raise a baby correctly either.

varoksa
01-18-2009, 05:57
demonbaby!

Megumi
01-18-2009, 05:57
While that is definitely true. There is still not a reasonable argument as to why gay men can't raise a baby correctly either.

There is no reasonable argument for it.

PhreakShow
01-18-2009, 05:58
There is no reasonable argument for it.

never has been never will.

Honest Bill
01-18-2009, 06:00
There is no reasonable argument for it.

There is no reasonable argument as to a man and a woman being able to either, and in fact plenty of examples to the contrary.

I'd say the best argument, is that adults who are not complete idiots can do it correctly. And therefore till someone can prove homos are mentally defficient. There should not be an issue

1998altima
01-18-2009, 06:00
I thought this was common sense. Apparently not.

Zombie00
01-18-2009, 06:04
Fact: Kids raised by lesbian parents have twice the chances of developing a strong and negative Edipo complex.
xD

Honest Bill
01-18-2009, 06:05
Fact: Kids raised by lesbian parents have twice the chances to develop a strong and negative Edipo complex.
xD


Fact: Angelina Jolie keeps drunk dialling me, and suggesting we "get back together"

Ftang
01-18-2009, 06:06
I thought this was common sense. Apparently not.
it used to be common sense that excess phlegm caused aspergers (hippocrates, four humours etc). i hope you now understand why people investigate things scientifically as opposed to continuing their dumbfuckery.

Zombie00
01-18-2009, 06:07
Fact: Angelina Jolie keeps drunk dialling me, and suggesting we "get back together"

Fact: Bewbs are awesome.

Sirmolle
01-18-2009, 06:13
You're doing your child a disfavor by protecting them from ridicule and harassement. Some day they will have to face reality, and you want them to be ready. That is why I've named my son Sue.

Honest Bill
01-18-2009, 06:13
You're doing your child a disfavor by protecting them from ridicule and harassement. Some day they will have to face reality, and you want them to be ready. That is why I've named my son Sue.

Haha. Who sang that song? Link it immediately

Megumi
01-18-2009, 06:14
Haha. Who sang that song? Link it immediately

Johnny Cash. (http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=M89c3hWx3RQ)

Honest Bill
01-18-2009, 06:16
Johnny Cash. (http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=M89c3hWx3RQ)


Haha, nice one thanks

Lamiosa
01-18-2009, 06:16
You're doing your child a disfavor by protecting them from ridicule and harassement. Some day they will have to face reality, and you want them to be ready. That is why I've named my son Sue.

Best you call your son "gaylord" then, hehe

SimonVDH
01-18-2009, 06:18
Fact: Angelina Jolie keeps drunk dialling me, and suggesting we "get back together"

Fact: I want to be you.

Honest Bill
01-18-2009, 06:19
Fact: I want to be you.


I'll give her your number.

Selzi
01-18-2009, 06:20
And your point is what?

We should all become lesbians.

SimonVDH
01-18-2009, 06:20
I'll give her your number.

I'v just http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4pXfHLUlZf4

Honest Bill
01-18-2009, 06:23
I'v just http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4pXfHLUlZf4

Haha when Bruce Willis was dead at the end of sixth sense?

Natdaprat
01-18-2009, 07:19
There was never any doubt that lesbians can raise children correctly, except in the minds of the irrational, and religious fundamentalists Wow, a sensible and normal post from Bill?


While that is definitely true. There is still not a reasonable argument as to why gay men can't raise a baby correctly either.
Another one?


There is no reasonable argument as to a man and a woman being able to either, and in fact plenty of examples to the contrary.

I'd say the best argument, is that adults who are not complete idiots can do it correctly. And therefore till someone can prove homos are mentally defficient. There should not be an issue.
Wow Bill, you're on fire with the sensible and normal posts today!


Fact: Angelina Jolie keeps drunk dialling me, and suggesting we "get back together

Ah, there we go.

Honest Bill
01-18-2009, 07:21
Wow, a sensible and normal post from Bill?


Another one?


Wow Bill, you're on fire with the sensible and normal posts today!



Ah, there we go.

Haha don't tell anyone.

Anyhow weren't you supposed to be sleeping?

Natdaprat
01-18-2009, 07:22
Haha don't tell anyone.

Anyhow weren't you supposed to be sleeping?

Nah. I'm working, or at least I'm supposed to be working.

Honest Bill
01-18-2009, 07:24
Nah. I'm working, or at least I'm supposed to be working.


Forumfalling is the worlds oldest proffession

alfaroverall
01-18-2009, 16:03
Fact: Kids raised by lesbian parents have twice the chances of developing a strong and negative Edipo complex.
xD
You mean Oedipus complex, and no, as the hatred of one's father is a fundamental component of an Oedipus complex; desire to have sex with one's mother does not make an Oedipus complex on its own.

On-topic: not surprising to me. I've always thought that homosexual parents can certainly raise children well but that ON AVERAGE (i.e. looking on the scale of millions of families) you would see more problems with homosexual parents than with heterosexual parents, because the children raised by the homosexual parents will in some way be lacking a masculine or a feminine component to the parenting. One partner could perhaps "be the dad" or "be the mom" but it's not quite the same. And those two components are important to successful parenting.

Whether or not said difference would be large is not something I'm equipped to say; I only think that there would be a difference.

Ankh
01-18-2009, 16:08
Means the child is ok of their parents till the kids in school begin to harass the child about it. Kids can be assholes, I saw it enough in Forumfall and WoW, nothing new to me.

That made me lol so fucking hard.

Haeso
01-18-2009, 16:13
You mean Oedipus complex, and no, as the hatred of one's father is a fundamental component of an Oedipus complex; desire to have sex with one's mother does not make an Oedipus complex on its own.

On-topic: not surprising to me. I've always thought that homosexual parents can certainly raise children well but that ON AVERAGE (i.e. looking on the scale of millions of families) you would see more problems with homosexual parents than with heterosexual parents, because the children raised by the homosexual parents will in some way be lacking a masculine or a feminine component to the parenting. One partner could perhaps "be the dad" or "be the mom" but it's not quite the same. And those two components are important to successful parenting.

Whether or not said difference would be large is not something I'm equipped to say; I only think that there would be a difference.

Anyone who suggests there is no difference is silly. Good or bad enough to care about? Questionable, but there's definitely a difference yes.

Pcheez
01-18-2009, 16:24
The kids were 10 at the time of the "analysis"

Any 10 fucking year old will be deemed "happy" and "functional".

Wait till the kid hits puberty and gets a sex drive.

If its a girl, she will start questioning why everyone else has a daddy and why mommy and mommy sleep in the same bed and make noises at night.

If its a guy, same thing, and when he learns about reproduction hes gonna start asking where babies come from. "Oh sweety, you came from some guy's testes" better yet "A syringe !"

When teh child gets exposed to porn, then gay porn, they will be able to make a distinction and realize what their parents are.

I would love to see this analysis done again when the child is 18-21.

taking bets on the males being very feminine if not gay, and the females being butch manhaters if not lesbian.

Sorry, homosexual couples should not be given the right of adoption till much more extensive research is done concluding that the child will be completely normal. By normal i do unfortunately mean, heterosexual.

Then again, who am i to say, they dont harm me, i just feel bad for the kids, and its already allowed in much of Yurop.

For the record, im no fundy, neither do i dislike homosexuals, but i do not like the idea of homosexuality being encouraged. I do in the shallow sense that more women for me, but it does mean less women as well due to lesbianism :<

Delwyn
01-18-2009, 16:35
My, how strange.

alfaroverall
01-18-2009, 16:37
The kids were 10 at the time of the "analysis"

Any 10 fucking year old will be deemed "happy" and "functional".

Wait till the kid hits puberty and gets a sex drive.

If its a girl, she will start questioning why everyone else has a daddy and why mommy and mommy sleep in the same bed and make noises at night.

If its a guy, same thing, and when he learns about reproduction hes gonna start asking where babies come from. "Oh sweety, you came from some guy's testes" better yet "A syringe !"

When teh child gets exposed to porn, then gay porn, they will be able to make a distinction and realize what their parents are.

I would love to see this analysis done again when the child is 18-21.

taking bets on the males being very feminine if not gay, and the females being butch manhaters if not lesbian.

Sorry, homosexual couples should not be given the right of adoption till much more extensive research is done concluding that the child will be completely normal. By normal i do unfortunately mean, heterosexual.

Then again, who am i to say, they dont harm me, i just feel bad for the kids, and its already allowed in much of Yurop.

For the record, im no fundy, neither do i dislike homosexuals, but i do not like the idea of homosexuality being encouraged. I do in the shallow sense that more women for me, but it does mean less women as well due to lesbianism :<
Why is heterosexuality so favorable? We have 7 billion fucking people on this planet. We'll have 9 billion by 2050 and 10 billion by 2200. If a billion of them went gay and they were evenly distributed around the planet, it would be GOOD, not bad.

Again, I'd basically say that the partial loss of a masculine/feminine component to parenting, in addition to your idea about the elevated awkwardness of the "birds and the bees" conversation, would cause some detriment. I'd also say that homosexuals have to take more care to not be fucktards, because parenting in a homosexual manner is not in line with their instincts. They have to make attempts to blend the two, to have distinct roles that are not automatically established by biology, etc. I don't think that the "hyper feminine if not gay male" or "hyper masculine if not lesbian female" effect is guaranteed if the parents are careful about it.

Pcheez
01-18-2009, 16:40
Why is heterosexuality so favorable? We have 7 billion fucking people on this planet. We'll have 9 billion by 2050 and 10 billion by 2200. If a billion of them went gay and they were evenly distributed around the planet, it would be GOOD, not bad.

Nono you have wars to deal with that, not homosexuals.

Haeso
01-18-2009, 16:44
Nono you have wars to deal with that, not homosexuals.

Stupid people should just be killed, the world would be such a better place to live.

SimonVDH
01-18-2009, 16:44
Nono you have wars to deal with that, not homosexuals.

You'r joking, right??

ExiliuM
01-18-2009, 16:45
Studies lately are fucking "no shit". Last week I saw "math classes are boring, according to scientific study". What the fuck do these people do?

Honest Bill
01-18-2009, 16:45
Stupid people should just be killed, the world would be such a better place to live.


Army recruits?

alfaroverall
01-18-2009, 16:47
Nono you have wars to deal with that, not homosexuals.
Wiping out the youth that can actually produce resources ftw? Massive economic chaos due to a lack of resources ftw?

Plus, the face of warfare has changed. Massive death a la WWII is no longer the standard. You see small death tolls from guerrilla warfare, especially with urban guerrilla warfare, or perhaps a nuclear holocaust that kills us all. The middle ground doesn't happen. Hell, even if it somehow did, there's no area where 1 billion people but not everyone dies. And as frightening as this is to say, killing 100 million people in a war (well over the number killed in WWII) would not be that large of an effect on our population. 1/70=<2%.

Haeso
01-18-2009, 16:47
Army recruits?

I mean all stupid people, not just stupid nationalists.

Honest Bill
01-18-2009, 16:48
I mean all stupid people, not just stupid nationalists.

Ah fair play

Pcheez
01-18-2009, 16:49
Wiping out the youth that can actually produce resources ftw? Massive economic chaos due to a lack of resources ftw?

Plus, the face of warfare has changed. Massive death a la WWII is no longer the standard. You see small death tolls from guerrilla warfare, especially with urban guerrilla warfare, or perhaps a nuclear holocaust that kills us all. The middle ground doesn't happen. Hell, even if it somehow did, there's no area where 1 billion people but not everyone dies. And as frightening as this is to say, killing 100 million people in a war (well over the number killed in WWII) would not be that large of an effect on our population. 1/70=<2%.

War simply needs to get more effective then.

I recommend standard issue biological warfare, coupled with today's dense person/km2, think of the carnage !

Wipe out half a billion easily.

Marelt
01-18-2009, 16:49
Nono you have wars to deal with that, not homosexuals.

We just need to make a life threatening sport (Dueling with guns) very very appealing. That way we can cut down the stupid population while the intelligent ones remain.

Yes yes?

Marelt
01-18-2009, 16:52
Here's another idea, Encourage scene kids to start cutting themselves. Then start making fun of them for cutting themselves?

Atnas
01-18-2009, 16:54
Means the child is ok of their parents till the kids in school begin to harass the child about it. Kids can be assholes, I saw it enough in Forumfall and WoW, nothing new to me.

No kid would ever harass someone else for having lesbians as parents. Ever.

alfaroverall
01-18-2009, 16:55
War simply needs to get more effective then.

I recommend standard issue biological warfare, coupled with today's dense person/km2, think of the carnage !

Wipe out half a billion easily.
That would lead to a nuclear holocaust in retaliation. Again, there is no middle ground anymore.

No kid would ever harass someone else for having lesbians as parents. Ever.
A girl might harass a girl about it. A guy would not harass a guy or a girl about it, however.

Pcheez
01-18-2009, 16:55
No kid would ever harass someone else for having lesbians as parents. Ever.

He would want to sleepover then rape both his moms converting them both showing them the proper way of the dong.

The mommies then split, each get themselves a well endowed biker boyfriend.

Voila, the kid now has 4 parents to abuse him

Haeso
01-18-2009, 16:55
No kid would ever harass someone else for having lesbians as parents. Ever.

That's as stupid as the kid who told everyone about how his teacher was having sex with him, fucking idiots.

Nehemia
01-18-2009, 17:13
killing 100 million people in a war (well over the number killed in WWII) would not be that large of an effect on our population. 1/70=<2%.

Yeah but you'll manage to wipe out 20x Finland's with that about of dead count.

Pcheez
01-18-2009, 17:15
Yeah but you'll manage to wipe out 20x Finland's with that about of dead count.

The hell is a Finland ?

Gunther TheBlack
01-18-2009, 17:16
Happy as in "gay"?

Ankh
01-18-2009, 17:18
Happy as in "gay"?

"Gay" isn't PC enough, try "alternative" or "special".

alfaroverall
01-18-2009, 17:36
Yeah but you'll manage to wipe out 20x Finland's with that about of dead count.
I think your English is degrading a bit Nehemia. Pop up an Open RP for practice :p

Zaene
01-18-2009, 17:44
its just wrong ... you guys are a bunch of homosympethetic idiots.

wait till these lesbianized children grow up. they will be maladjusted spree killers and baby rapists

Lamiosa
01-18-2009, 17:46
its just wrong ... you guys are a bunch of homosympethetic idiots.

wait till these lesbianized children grow up. they will be maladjusted spree killers and baby rapists

Like you became an idiot without school-leaving qualification, because your parents were drunkards?

Marrik
01-18-2009, 17:49
While that is definitely true. There is still not a reasonable argument as to why gay men can't raise a baby correctly either.

because, they are Godless sodomites, and they will corrupt the children and turn them into Satan-worshipping faggots

Rourke
01-18-2009, 17:52
because, they are Godless sodomites, and they will corrupt the children and turn them into Satan-worshipping faggots


While this is a bit extreme, you do have to wonder how adjusted a child will grow up if all they see is a same-sex couple all thier life. Most gay people, from what I have seen have just as bad of a track record in relationships as Straight couples.

God forbid a kid has to grow up with TWO guys crying every day...Man...that's gonna be ONE QQing future gamer.

Lamiosa
01-18-2009, 18:09
Guess many women became lesbians because of many of these guys who posted here.

alfaroverall
01-18-2009, 18:12
Guess many women became lesbians because of many of these guys who posted here.
Have you forgotten that there are no women on the Internet?

Lamiosa
01-18-2009, 18:13
Have you forgotten that there are no women on the Internet?

Like here? http://www.zockerweibchen.de/

alfaroverall
01-18-2009, 18:19
Like here? http://www.zockerweibchen.de/
You seriously believe that a site like that is populated by actual women? That's like decepticon central. The handful of women on these forums who don't try really really hard to make it seem like they are women are fairly believable; I'll believe it fully when I see pics that verify things (like "fuck you forumfall" on a sign being held by a girl) but in general it's fairly believable on these forums. That site isn't believable at all.

Zushakon
01-18-2009, 18:19
Means the child is ok of their parents till the kids in school begin to harass the child about it. Kids can be assholes, I saw it enough in Forumfall and WoW, nothing new to me.
You saw that in Forumfall and WoW? lol you never went to school? I used to bully other kids so they wouldn't go to school for weeks for far minor things than having 2 mums. Real life kids are far worse than internet kids. :)

Zushakon
01-18-2009, 18:22
A girl might harass a girl about it. A guy would not harass a guy or a girl about it, however.

wtf you kidding? Being a former bully and all, I can tell you that's the exact kinda thing I could have harassed the shit out of someone for in the middle grades.

Lamiosa
01-18-2009, 18:23
You seriously believe that a site like that is populated by actual women? That's like decepticon central. The handful of women on these forums who don't try really really hard to make it seem like they are women are fairly believable; I'll believe it fully when I see pics that verify things (like "fuck you forumfall" on a sign being held by a girl) but in general it's fairly believable on these forums. That site isn't believable at all.

I believe it, because I am member there as well and many of my friends play games as well, but they are not such into MMORPGs. Do you really think all were that stupid to fall into this "send me picture"-traps? If you still think there are no women in the internet, why are you bugging me with and ask for pictures?

Lysandor
01-18-2009, 18:24
You'r joking, right??

No, he isn't. Or at least he shouldn't be, because it is correct.

Part of Natural Selection is aggression toward weakness, perceived or real.

We are at the point in our development as a species that we can fight nature successfully. However that limits the population control mechanisms we can take advantage of.

But it is vital to longterm survival, so ultimately we will either have a species apocalypse (Ultra Meta War) or an ultra regulated society.

alfaroverall
01-18-2009, 18:26
I believe it, because I am member there as well and many of my friends play games as well, but they are not such into MMORPGs. Do you really think all were that stupid to fall into this "send me picture"-traps? If you still think there are no women in the internet, why are you bugging me with and ask for pictures?
For proof to disturb our belief, that's why. It would be very simple to take a picture of yourself, fully clothed, holding a sign saying "fuck you forumfall" and yet no woman that has been asked to do so has done so. I have no idea why.

wtf you kidding? Being a former bully and all, I can tell you that's the exact kinda thing I could have harassed the shit out of someone for in the middle grades.
You would harass a guy if he had 2 moms? Seriously? Let's say said moms were under the age of 40 and still pretty hot. Would that change your sentiment?

Lamiosa
01-18-2009, 18:28
For proof to disturb our belief, that's why. It would be very simple to take a picture of yourself, fully clothed, holding a sign saying "fuck you forumfall" and yet no woman that has been asked to do so has done so. I have no idea why.

You would harass a guy if he had 2 moms? Seriously? Let's say said moms were under the age of 40 and still pretty hot. Would that change your sentiment?

Question: Do I need this? I just do not lie anymore, so I won't tell I would be a guy. But being a guy in a macho-community is way easier, so believe I am a guy, easy.

omnigol
01-18-2009, 18:36
There was never any doubt that lesbians can raise children correctly, except in the minds of the irrational, and religious fundamentalists

You know the kids were only 10 years old when they interviewed them for the study? You know there are different types of people, and some kids may do fine, while other kids would end up extremely fucked up? You wouldn't happen to have a value system that asserts that not only is gay love ok for consenting adults, but that it is good and everyone must respect it if they are reasonable? Human psychology is complicated if anything; only an irrational douche would conclude letting lesbians adopt is now assuredly a good thing.

Bosemann
01-18-2009, 18:38
While this is a bit extreme, you do have to wonder how adjusted a child will grow up if all they see is a same-sex couple all thier life. Most gay people, from what I have seen have just as bad of a track record in relationships as Straight couples.

God forbid a kid has to grow up with TWO guys crying every day...Man...that's gonna be ONE QQing future gamer.

Kids can and are raised by single parents and turn out fine. So whats with this strange idea about having male/female balance in raising kids. Shouldn't people that have qualms about same sex couples raising kids be just as up-in-arms about single parents?

alfaroverall
01-18-2009, 18:38
Question: Do I need this? I just do not lie anymore, so I won't tell I would be a guy. But being a guy in a macho-community is way easier, so believe I am a guy, easy.
If you verified you were a girl in a macho guy community, you would be worshiped.

Pcheez
01-18-2009, 18:40
Question: Do I need this? I just do not lie anymore, so I won't tell I would be a guy. But being a guy in a macho-community is way easier, so believe I am a guy, easy.

I do not see why women online do not claim to be men.

it would really be much easier for everyone and eliminate 99% of online drama.

Haeso
01-18-2009, 18:45
I do not see why women online do not claim to be men.

it would really be much easier for everyone and eliminate 99% of online drama.

But drama is fun.... (So are cyborz)

Zushakon
01-18-2009, 18:52
Fact: Kids raised by lesbian parents have twice the chances of developing a strong and negative Edipo complex.
xD
Oedipus complex you mean?

Ceneko
01-18-2009, 19:04
Stupid people should just be killed, the world would be such a better place to live.

Who the hell is going to clean the streets, etc then? Almost all stupid people should be killed, then bring back slavery (6)

Lamiosa
01-18-2009, 19:07
I do not see why women online do not claim to be men.

it would really be much easier for everyone and eliminate 99% of online drama.

I did this on an german UO-Freeshard as I led a big guild. As it came out at end that I would be female, they were bad about. Not that I was female but that I did not tell them they said.

Drakhan
01-18-2009, 19:14
Lesbian parents? Guess when you are a child it somewhat hinders you in getting friends but when you get older its probably a fucking friend-magnet.

Megumi
01-18-2009, 19:16
I do not see why women online do not claim to be men.

it would really be much easier for everyone and eliminate 99% of online drama.

It's not working for me.

I keep insisting that I'm male but no one will listen :(

Lysandor
01-18-2009, 19:23
I did this on an german UO-Freeshard as I led a big guild. As it came out at end that I would be female, they were bad about. Not that I was female but that I did not tell them they said.

Why does it even matter? Unless you are pursuing cybor-relations or course.

kiasta
01-18-2009, 19:52
Lesbian parents raise happy, healthy children according to 22-year study (http://www.pinknews.co.uk/news/articles/2005-10025.html)

LIES and propaganda!

kiasta
01-18-2009, 19:58
There was never any doubt that lesbians can raise children correctly, except in the minds of the irrational, and religious fundamentalists

Rationale is in the eyes of the beholder. I'm not religious nor am a fundamentalist. However I do have problems with homosexuality. Yeah go ahead and call me homophobic because that is all you can do. I'm not homophobic as I'm not afraid of homosexuals I just get this annoying queasy feeling when I see two guys making out.

Eoren
01-18-2009, 20:43
Rationale is in the eyes of the beholder. I'm not religious nor am a fundamentalist. However I do have problems with homosexuality. Yeah go ahead and call me homophobic because that is all you can do. I'm not homophobic as I'm not afraid of homosexuals I just get this annoying queasy feeling when I see two guys making out.

It's simple, you are not so sure about ur own sexuality. If you were sure about you wouldn't give a shit.

Lamiosa
01-18-2009, 20:44
It's not working for me.

I keep insisting that I'm male but no one will listen :(

Will make a new sig just for you to fix it.

Poacher
01-18-2009, 20:57
Fact: Bewbs are awesome.

Fact.

Edit: I have yet to investigate it fully and I'm not disagreeing with it as I believe the only link between well raised children and their parents, be they straight or not, is the intelligence of the parents, but that news site looks like a zealously pro-gay site, and I'd be careful about accepting everything it says, as I would with any site/paper/blog/what-have-you that is heavily biased towards any group.

Kin
01-18-2009, 20:58
What a joke.... Interviewing a 10 year old kid and making that claim.


Then again, I expected nothing less then from a website with the URL- pinknews.co.uk... rofl :lmao:

Zushakon
01-18-2009, 21:47
It's not working for me.

I keep insisting that I'm male but no one will listen :(
What? There's still people that thinks you're female?

alfaroverall
01-18-2009, 21:49
Rationale is in the eyes of the beholder. I'm not religious nor am a fundamentalist. However I do have problems with homosexuality. Yeah go ahead and call me homophobic because that is all you can do. I'm not homophobic as I'm not afraid of homosexuals I just get this annoying queasy feeling when I see two guys making out.
-phobic in the context of homophobic doesn't mean the same thing as it does with, e.g., arachnophobic.

Gibsnag
01-18-2009, 21:53
Rationale is in the eyes of the beholder. I'm not religious nor am a fundamentalist. However I do have problems with homosexuality. Yeah go ahead and call me homophobic because that is all you can do. I'm not homophobic as I'm not afraid of homosexuals I just get this annoying queasy feeling when I see two guys making out.

Sounds like someone is pretty deeeep in the closet.

Vaalsha
01-18-2009, 21:56
I got to say its better for a hetrosexual couple to raise a kid then a homosexual couple BUT there is no reason to restrict gay or lesbian parents from adopting. Im sure the kid has a MUCH better life then if he or she was in an orphanage!

tsalin
01-18-2009, 22:05
Rationale is in the eyes of the beholder. I'm not religious nor am a fundamentalist. However I do have problems with homosexuality. Yeah go ahead and call me homophobic because that is all you can do. I'm not homophobic as I'm not afraid of homosexuals I just get this annoying queasy feeling when I see two guys making out. I don't think you deserved to be flamed as a homophobe for saying this.

When you say, "I have problems with homosexuality," you mean that viewing it makes you feel discomfort. You feel as though the exhibit of homoerotic actions is unattractive, unnatural, or disturbing. This seems acceptable to me, as many people find other kinds of things disturbing which others find sexually arousing. Obviously, some sexual activities can result in procreation, some don't, some are illegal, and some are potentially harmful to the participants. Different strokes for different folks.

Kin
01-18-2009, 22:09
Sounds like someone is pretty deeeep in the closet.


Did you find wide acceptance when you came out of the closet? Also, were you ashamed while you were in it?

bluthorn
01-18-2009, 22:31
-phobic in the context of homophobic doesn't mean the same thing as it does with, e.g., arachnophobic.

it's connotation is indeed different. It's literal meaning, however, is unchanged.

Also, a pro-gay site cites a study that *GASP!* promotes homosexuality? No waiz!

Spineless_DoO
01-19-2009, 13:03
While that is definitely true. There is still not a reasonable argument as to why gay men can't raise a baby correctly either.

Same reason male lions eat baby lions. Its against the natural order. People over estimate the human race. We are nothing more then animals capable of higher thinking then the other animals around us.

saltwaterteffy
01-19-2009, 13:07
Same reason male lions eat baby lions. Its against the natural order. People over estimate the human race. We are nothing more then animals capable of higher thinking then the other animals around us.

so then theres no reason that this higher thinking can't support a healthy family. Oh and...humans don't eat their young.

Sqarak
01-19-2009, 13:15
Same reason male lions eat baby lions. Its against the natural order. People over estimate the human race. We are nothing more then animals capable of higher thinking then the other animals around us.

Gay people can't raise children because male lions eat cubs...what kind of crazy theory is that?
I only know two lesbians but I'm definitely going to ask them if they happen to eat babies.

saltwaterteffy
01-19-2009, 13:17
Gay people can't raise children because male lions eat cubs...what kind of crazy theory is that?
I only know two lesbians but I'm definitely going to ask them if they happen to eat babies.

well i think that lesbians get closer to eating babies than most women if you catch my drift :D

Grimness
01-19-2009, 13:17
its just wrong ... You guys are a bunch of homosympethetic idiots.

Wait till these lesbianized children grow up. They will be maladjusted spree killers and baby rapists

lol

Sqarak
01-19-2009, 13:22
well i think that lesbians get closer to eating babies than most women if you catch my drift :D

:confused:

...might as well delete half of my pr0n stash now

SimonVDH
01-19-2009, 13:44
well i think that lesbians get closer to eating babies than most women if you catch my drift :D


:lmao::lmao:

Ok, seriously, IMHO nobody has right to tell other people if or how they can or can not raise children aslong as the children doesn't get hurt, and no, I don't think that you're hurting your child becouse you're homosexual. Beeing homosexual is natural, your born that way, and it happens to both human and animals.

jonyak
01-19-2009, 13:59
oh this retarded argument again. with the same retarded people making the same ignorant arguments.

Woohoo!!:sly:

Sqarak
01-19-2009, 14:13
oh this retarded argument again. with the same retarded people making the same ignorant arguments.


which retarded argument, you need to be a bit more specific around here.

jonyak
01-19-2009, 15:20
which retarded argument, you need to be a bit more specific around here.

No I don't.

orince
01-19-2009, 17:07
man... i would NOT want to be their child... the childhood must be a fucking pain.. suicidewarning

Lysandor
01-19-2009, 18:26
I have girls eat my babies by the billions.