PDA

View Full Version : News: Child Porn Charges?


Crying Hyena
01-15-2009, 10:20 PM
Sending nakie pics to you sig other is something we all do, look up, or hear about but when teens send them to each other, they get charged with child porn? No I won't be sending nakie pics to anyone on this forum.

http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/bestoftv/2009/01/15/pn.sexting.teens.cnn

DeadlyHit
01-15-2009, 10:26 PM
So you won't be sending me nudes? :(

Niles
01-15-2009, 10:29 PM
Wait, so if a girl sends me pics it's child porn?

Crying Hyena
01-15-2009, 10:29 PM
So you won't be sending me nudes? :(

Sorry to disappoint you. Guess you'll just have to use you imagination :sly:.

Honest Bill
01-15-2009, 10:30 PM
Wait, so if a girl sends me pics it's child porn?

Only if she's a child

Niles
01-15-2009, 10:31 PM
Only if she's a child

But the OP said teens sending to other teens.

Crying Hyena
01-15-2009, 10:32 PM
Only if she's a child

But how are you going to charge an under 18 yr old for child porn. It's kida like charging Arabs for racial violence because they beat up other Arabs :bang:.

DeadlyHit
01-15-2009, 10:33 PM
Sorry to disappoint you. Guess you'll just have to use you imagination :sly:.

*tries to fap*

Just can't do it :(

:ninja:

Honest Bill
01-15-2009, 10:33 PM
But how are you going to charge an under 18 yr old for child porn. It's kida like charging Arabs for racial violence because they beat up other Arabs :bang:.

I agree it's stupid. But the teen could sell them on, and have over 9000 customers

PrimalSign
01-15-2009, 10:34 PM
It's child porn... because they can't punish them for anything else? This level of stupidity is just... wow.

zie
01-15-2009, 10:36 PM
Ok so what happens if you're on the receiving end of these, and you had no idea she was under 18?

purely hypothetical question btw!

Forgin
01-15-2009, 10:37 PM
God that's retarded...

btw I've always wondered, could two 15 year olds actually get punished for having sex (in a country where the legal age to have sex is 18)?

Toilet
01-15-2009, 10:38 PM
Ok so what happens if you're on the receiving end of these, and you had no idea she was under 18?

purely hypothetical question btw!

Only if you show them to others do you get charged.

zie
01-15-2009, 10:38 PM
God that's retarded...

btw I've always wondered, could two 15 year olds actually get punished for having sex (in a country where the legal age to have sex is 18)?


in some retarded US states yeah, i forget which ones though

Crying Hyena
01-15-2009, 10:38 PM
Ok so what happens if you're on the receiving end of these, and you had no idea she was under 18?

purely hypothetical question btw!

There are quite a few cases of that on myspace and they all went to jail.

zie
01-15-2009, 10:41 PM
There are quite a few cases of that on myspace and they all went to jail.

i am talking specifically about text/pix messaging, not internet perving. like if some underage ho randomly texts me nudes then later she gets caught, are the cops going to go through her phone records and come for me!?

shook
01-15-2009, 10:42 PM
lol at the caller

"this is what happens when you take the bibles out of the schools"

yea, god is going to save us from teens being stupid and not thinking.

IthroZada
01-15-2009, 10:42 PM
Ok so what happens if you're on the receiving end of these, and you had no idea she was under 18?

purely hypothetical question btw!

The "I didn't know she was under 18" excuse has never ever worked even if it is true, those guys are screwed

Edit:lol at the caller

"this is what happens when you take the bibles out of the schools"

yea, god is going to save us from teens being stupid and not thinking.
Everyone knows about the recently rediscovered 11th commandment: teenagers shall not send nude pics


Cause you know, guys in the bible didn't knock up under 18 girls all the fucking time

Butcher
01-15-2009, 10:44 PM
ehh I saw that predator programe on FX, its about these guys who hunt down pedos by pretending to be underage, in chats. They have many of those logs, uncensored in perverted justice (google that yourself)

But basically even with that evidence, they can hardly get any charges in there. So unless you are Michael Jackson, no one really gives a damn

Haldred
01-15-2009, 10:44 PM
Sorry to disappoint you. Guess you'll just have to use you imagination :sly:.

if I look at a girl my age naked (under 18) than am I committing child molestation and/or possibly rape?

Fuck better keep my exploits on the DL.

IthroZada
01-15-2009, 10:46 PM
if I look at a girl my age naked (under 18) than am I committing child molestation and/or possibly rape?

Fuck better keep my exploits on the DL.

Makes me wonder if I'm gonna get arrested for statutory rape now

Kind of ironic how hardcore kinky sex is perfectly legal between teens but dear lord one picture and your fucking screwed

Krush
01-15-2009, 10:49 PM
Sending nakie pics to you sig other is something we all do, look up, or hear about but when teens send them to each other, they get charged with child porn? No I won't be sending nakie pics to anyone on this forum.

http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/bestoftv/2009/01/15/pn.sexting.teens.cnn
misspelling, leaving out letters, shortening words, makes you're post hard to read

"Sending nakie pics to you sig other" = "Sending naked pictures to your significant other"

using sig for significant on a forum is just dumb, since most would assume you meant signature

Floyd
01-15-2009, 10:51 PM
Ahh I thought this was going to be about the price of child porn going down.

:(

Sabbathius
01-15-2009, 10:53 PM
Yes, they should be punished? Who says? Did the boys say "OMG I'm so offended!" Even if those girls were coyote ugly, who cares?

And the stupid cow, um, sorry, the ex-prosecutor, says child porn charge is heavy handed, but there really ISN'T ANYTHING ELSE TO CHARGE? HELLO?! The answer should be obvious: don't charge them. Should I be charged with terrorism for farting at a court house last Wednesday? I did it loudly too! But hey, nothing else I can be charged with, so why not terrorism? Because if they want to send a message that farting in a courthouse is not a game, that's the way to do it? Why not line up those kids against the wall and shoot them, execution style, to send a message, if you're gonna do that? You're setting a precedent, you freakign retards... :bang:

People in real child porn business will hunt you down? WTF are they, the CIA?! How the HELL do you find a teen based on their picture and nothing else, no identifying landmarks (which I guarantee 99.999% of all nudie pictures in the world don't have). And then they hunt you down? Yeah, right. Especially in a state where kidnapping is a capital offense when being a convicted pedophile is not? Yeah, they're going to hunt you down and use you... :rolleyes:

And the caller, Bible-slapping ignoramus? Did Bible or God stopped ANYONE here from feeling up a member of the opposite sex when you had a shot at it in your teens? Anyone? Show of hands? No? Didn't think so. Did teens never get knocked up back in the day when Bible was taught in schools (and still is, in backwoods countries), or did they simply have them and dump them in a dumpster, with their high morals? Or were sent to relatives and then passed off the kid as a little brother or sister. Yes, yes, that's SOOO much better... :lmao:

There. I've successfully manage to channel all of my anger about Darkfall being delayed yet again into an off-topic post. Learn, kids, and you won't have to worry about infractions on Advanced Discussions anymore! :D

Butcher
01-15-2009, 10:58 PM
And the caller, Bible-slapping ignoramus? Did Bible or God stopped ANYONE here from feeling up a member of the opposite sex when you had a shot at it in your teens? Anyone? Show of hands? No? Didn't think so. Did teens never get knocked up back in the day when Bible was taught in schools (and still is, in backwoods countries), or did they simply have them and dump them in a dumpster, with their high morals? Or were sent to relatives and then passed off the kid as a little brother or sister. Yes, yes, that's SOOO much better... :lmao:




And ever since they started teaching Darwin's theory everyone became gay.

Layedballer
01-15-2009, 10:59 PM
That means that when I was a kid(under 18) and I saw my girls naked I was a pedo. It's retarded really

Butcher
01-15-2009, 11:04 PM
That means that when I was a kid(under 18) and I saw my girls naked I was a pedo. It's retarded really

should have moved to England then. Its 16 here.

Whats the lowest age of conscent?
I think its 14 in some country where they moved it up recently from 12 but forgot which 1.

StainlessSteelRat
01-15-2009, 11:06 PM
Rampant stupidity like this will be(is) the downfall of the US.

Oh, and I think some of you may have missed it but they are charging the boyfriends as well.

Crying Hyena
01-15-2009, 11:09 PM
misspelling, leaving out letters, shortening words, makes you're post hard to read

"Sending nakie pics to you sig other" = "Sending naked pictures to your significant other"

using sig for significant on a forum is just dumb, since most would assume you meant signature

Maybe you should write a list of forum approved grammatical rules so you can read posts without inconvenience and then post them so we all can read.

Elemancer
01-15-2009, 11:10 PM
Yes, they should be punished? Who says? Did the boys say "OMG I'm so offended!" Even if those girls were coyote ugly, who cares?

And the stupid cow, um, sorry, the ex-prosecutor, says child porn charge is heavy handed, but there really ISN'T ANYTHING ELSE TO CHARGE? HELLO?! The answer should be obvious: don't charge them. Should I be charged with terrorism for farting at a court house last Wednesday? I did it loudly too! But hey, nothing else I can be charged with, so why not terrorism? Because if they want to send a message that farting in a courthouse is not a game, that's the way to do it? Why not line up those kids against the wall and shoot them, execution style, to send a message, if you're gonna do that? You're setting a precedent, you freakign retards... :bang:

People in real child porn business will hunt you down? WTF are they, the CIA?! How the HELL do you find a teen based on their picture and nothing else, no identifying landmarks (which I guarantee 99.999% of all nudie pictures in the world don't have). And then they hunt you down? Yeah, right. Especially in a state where kidnapping is a capital offense when being a convicted pedophile is not? Yeah, they're going to hunt you down and use you... :rolleyes:

And the caller, Bible-slapping ignoramus? Did Bible or God stopped ANYONE here from feeling up a member of the opposite sex when you had a shot at it in your teens? Anyone? Show of hands? No? Didn't think so. Did teens never get knocked up back in the day when Bible was taught in schools (and still is, in backwoods countries), or did they simply have them and dump them in a dumpster, with their high morals? Or were sent to relatives and then passed off the kid as a little brother or sister. Yes, yes, that's SOOO much better... :lmao:

There. I've successfully manage to channel all of my anger about Darkfall being delayed yet again into an off-topic post. Learn, kids, and you won't have to worry about infractions on Advanced Discussions anymore! :D

It's about precedence, numbnuts. Quit being so kneejerk. Like they said, this will likely get plea'd down to some little minor statute of the grandpappy statute. I happen to agree that there NEEDS to be an example made here. The idea that these kids should get off skotch free will allow pedos caught utilizing these kids as mules to ad hoc their sicko world. Suppose it was a 16 year old girl sending this to an 18 yo, or a 22, or 26....where do we draw the line? Just because your older can be made out to be age discriminatory. So yea...they violated the law for distribution of kiddie porn...really they could throw the book at them, so leniency in this case is being generous.

IthroZada
01-15-2009, 11:21 PM
It's about precedence, numbnuts. Quit being so kneejerk. Like they said, this will likely get plea'd down to some little minor statute of the grandpappy statute. I happen to agree that there NEEDS to be an example made here. The idea that these kids should get off skotch free will allow pedos caught utilizing these kids as mules to ad hoc their sicko world. Suppose it was a 16 year old girl sending this to an 18 yo, or a 22, or 26....where do we draw the line? Just because your older can be made out to be age discriminatory. So yea...they violated the law for distribution of kiddie porn...really they could throw the book at them, so leniency in this case is being generous.

What does it matter if a 16 year old sends it to an 18 year old guy? Sure 22 is more then stretching it but there is like a 3 year difference in the age of consent laws to where if you are within 3 years of age the age of consent doesn't matter. So a 16 year old girl can have sex with an 18 year old whenever she wants but the moment she sends a picture they both get criminal charges?

Mpetayne
01-15-2009, 11:22 PM
Does this mean my mom is fucked with all of her children's baby bath pictures?

kiasta
01-16-2009, 12:10 AM
Sending nakie pics to you sig other is something we all do, look up, or hear about but when teens send them to each other, they get charged with child porn? No I won't be sending nakie pics to anyone on this forum.

http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/bestoftv/2009/01/15/pn.sexting.teens.cnn

You know the cops are jerking to the evidence..

Legatosoren
01-16-2009, 12:15 AM
Sending nakie pics to you sig other is something we all do, look up, or hear about but when teens send them to each other, they get charged with child porn? No I won't be sending nakie pics to anyone on this forum.

http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/bestoftv/2009/01/15/pn.sexting.teens.cnn

That entire video had no objectivity whatsoever. I knew this going in. It still made me sick a little.

kiasta
01-16-2009, 12:23 AM
Does this mean my mom is fucked with all of her children's baby bath pictures?

Yes, your mom is now classified as a pedophile. Apparently persons under the age of 18 do not have any skin under their clothes.

Wickfield
01-16-2009, 12:24 AM
They're going to charge kids with child porn, and it'll never come off of their records. Forever followed by a mistake they made as a teenager.

Just sucks.

Megumi
01-16-2009, 12:51 AM
Sorry to disappoint you. Guess you'll just have to use you imagination :sly:.

...

...

Mmmmmmmmmm.


Am i doin' it right?

Seriously though, that happened a few years ago to some 15 year old girl from myspace. Production and distribution of CP.

Baralis
01-16-2009, 12:54 AM
Im not agaisnt it being illegal but to charge them with a sex crime that will stay with them for the rest of thier life as well as make them now register as a sex offender is a little overboard for showing ones own body.